Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.space » Space Station
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Space Station [message #65635 is a reply to message #53729] Sat, 18 May 2013 21:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
al is currently offline  al
Messages: 168
Registered: May 2013
Karma:
Senior Member
Message-ID: <184@ames-lm.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Mar-84 21:44:49 EST
Article-I.D.: ames-lm.184
Posted: Mon Mar 19 21:44:49 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 20-Mar-84 06:29:17 EST
References: <3626@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA
Lines: 16

This is actually on empty shuttle space.  There are three unmentioned
reasons for 'wasted' space in the bay.

	o The shuttle has severe center of gravity restraints.  The
	  heavy stuff has to go in the back and if it's not heavy
	  enough you can't put anything in the front.

	o The shuttle is not yet capable of it's full nominal weight
	  carrying capacity - 65,000 lb.  It won't be for a few years
	  yet.

	o The IUS, built to fail by the Air Force, has caused cancellation
	  of two shuttle flights and caused another to go up almost
	  empty.  The damage is continuing by the way.  The most recent
	  IUS's delived to NASA failed their ground tests.  If you want
	  a turkey, give the project to the military.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Starstruck failure
Next Topic: "Re: big bang - (nf)"
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Mar 13 04:00:11 EDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06361 seconds