Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.micro » 68K vs. 16K vs. VAX
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
68K vs. 16K vs. VAX [message #64407] Sat, 18 May 2013 20:51 Go to next message
Seiler is currently offline  Seiler
Messages: 20
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Message-ID: <17019@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Feb-84 13:47:44 EST
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.17019
Posted: Wed Feb 29 13:47:44 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Mar-84 03:31:32 EST
Lines: 34

From:  Larry Seiler 

Another entry (apparently) in the 32 bit microprocessor sweepstakes is
the MicroVAX - a single chip implementation of the DEC VAX architecture.
I heard about it at a talk at MIT yesterday, which was a repeat of a talk
given at the International Solid State Circuits Conference recently.
The chip has 32 multiplexed address and data lines (32/32) and has an
external interface pretty much like any other microprocessor.  It has 
full VAX memory management on chip, as well as an interrupt controller and
clock generator.  The datapath is 32 bits wide, of course, and has (among
other goodies) a full barrel shifter.  External clock is 40MHz, internal
microcycle is 200ns, and the memory cycle time is 400ns.

The chip implements all of the VAX addressing modes, but doesn't directly 
implement all instructions or datatypes.  Stuff like packed decimal operations
are simulated, with a little bit of microcode assist.  Floating point 
operations are either simulated in assembly code or are performed in a
separate floating point chip (still being designed).  Estimates derived from
a variety of VAX programs suggest that the chip directly implements 98.1%
of executed instructions.  Performance is estimated to be equivalent to
a VAX 11/780.

The fly in the ointment is that DEC has not announced in what forms the chip
will be sold, eg, whether you can buy just the chip, or when you can buy it
in any form.  But the chip has been fabricated and is being debugged, so it
shouldn't be too awfully long before it will be available in some form.  Lots
of people are asking if it's worth waiting for the 68020 or the 16032/32032.
Do you think that the MicroVAX chip is worth waiting for?

	Larry Seiler

PS - I have worked for DEC (for what it's worth), but all information in 
     this message is from the talk given at MIT.
-------
Re: 68K vs. 16K vs. VAX [message #64409 is a reply to message #64407] Sat, 18 May 2013 20:51 Go to previous message
WLIM is currently offline  WLIM
Messages: 6
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Message-ID: <17036@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 29-Feb-84 23:31:51 EST
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.17036
Posted: Wed Feb 29 23:31:51 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Mar-84 03:32:09 EST
Lines: 9

From:  Willie Lim 

I was in the MicroVAX talk at MIT.  I am particularly interested in
the FPA (floating point accelerator) chip.  It would be nice if that
chip is commercially available.


Willie
-------
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: [BRODERICK@RU-BLUE.ARPA: C64 Auto load and run...]
Next Topic: MicroVAX chip != MicroVAX product
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Feb 19 13:31:28 EST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02773 seconds