Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Digital Archaeology » Computer Arcana » Commodore » Commodore Emulation » Best quality SID & sound settings in Vice?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Best quality SID & sound settings in Vice? [message #45616] Thu, 28 March 2013 00:21 Go to next message
Hg is currently offline  Hg
Messages: 162
Registered: January 2012
Karma: 0
Senior Member
There seem to be a multitude of options for configuring emulation
sound quality in VICE now - and there is even a standalone SID player
in the new VICE release. To save me having to test and evaluate every
single setting what combination of settings would give me the absolute
highest quality of SID emulation?

Thanx in advance

--
T
Re: Best quality SID & sound settings in Vice? [message #46730 is a reply to message #45616] Wed, 03 April 2013 13:49 Go to previous message
Groepaz is currently offline  Groepaz
Messages: 640
Registered: December 2011
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Hg wrote:

> There seem to be a multitude of options for configuring emulation

> sound quality in VICE now - and there is even a standalone SID player

> in the new VICE release. To save me having to test and evaluate every

> single setting what combination of settings would give me the absolute

> highest quality of SID emulation?


just use the default settings, anything else is matter of taste and/or
esoteric.

--

http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net
http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org

Every programmer knows the answer: $2b or (not $2b) is $ff.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Color64 with VICE on Ubuntu
Next Topic: Giving away CBM-PC cables/adaptors
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Nov 21 23:20:27 EST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05193 seconds