Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.startrek » Re: Enterprise vs. Death Star
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Enterprise vs. Death Star [message #135827] Wed, 15 May 1985 17:59 Go to next message
m1b is currently offline  m1b
Messages: 53
Registered: May 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Article-I.D.: rayssd.741
Posted: Wed May 15 17:59:11 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 16-May-85 23:47:27 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Raytheon Co., Portsmouth RI
Lines: 32


	This scenario sounds similar to 'The Corbomite Manuever' --
monstrous sphere vs dinky Enterprise.  Kirk definitely did not
want to lock horns with that baby.

	Even though the Death Star took some time to aim its nasty
beam, it still had thousands of weapons on the surface (not just in
the trench, either) that could discourage the Enterprise from a
frontal assault (front of a sphere!!?? :-) ).  Since there isn't
information to the contrary, one should assume that the Death Star's
beam weapons have the same range as the Enterprise.

	Also, there seemed to be a fair number of TIE fighters on
board that at the very least could be used as cannon fodder.  There
might even be a star destroyer or two tucked away in the bowels of
the DS.  The TIE fighters could zip around and just ram the Enterprise;
eventually they would take their toll on the shields.  Also, I would
think that the Enterprise does not have infinite energy to power her
phasers -- would she have enough to destroy the Death Star?

	Han Solo mentioned the shields of the Millenium Falcon
giving out from assaults from TIE fighters so it's a safe assumption
that the DS would have similar energy shields to give it some pro-
tection from the Enterprise's weapons.

	I think a better pair off could be Nomad vs the Death Star,
but that might be rather one-sided with Nomad trashing the DS.
The Enterprise could face off with Vader's Super Star Destroyer --
that should be a more even match.

Joe Barone,	{allegra, decvax!brunix, linus, ccice5}!rayssd!m1b
Raytheon Co,	Submarine Signal Div., Box 330, Portsmouth, RI  02871
Re: Re: Enterprise vs. Death Star [message #135852 is a reply to message #135827] Fri, 17 May 1985 15:25 Go to previous message
gts is currently offline  gts
Messages: 27
Registered: June 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Article-I.D.: wjh12.596
Posted: Fri May 17 15:25:37 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 19-May-85 05:42:49 EDT
References: <741@rayssd.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Harvard MicroWizards HQ
Lines: 18

 >  
 >  	This scenario sounds similar to 'The Corbomite Manuever' --
 >  monstrous sphere vs dinky Enterprise.  Kirk definitely did not
 >  want to lock horns with that baby.
 >  
 >  Joe Barone,	{allegra, decvax!brunix, linus, ccice5}!rayssd!m1b

What about the First Federation "monstrous sphere" vs the Death Star?
THAT could get interesting.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:		G. T. Samson
Title:		The Evil MicroWizard
Quote:		"No matter where you go...there you are." -- B. Banzai
Other_Quote:	"You speak treason!" "Fluently!" 	  -- The Doctor
ARPA:		gts@wjh12 [preferred] OR samson%h-sc4@harvard
USMail:		Lowell N-43, Harvard U., Cambridge, MA 02138
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Enough Already
Next Topic: More Enterprise vs everyone
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Jan 23 01:07:24 EST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.23036 seconds