Megalextoria
Retro computing and gaming, sci-fi books, tv and movies and other geeky stuff.

Home » Archive » net.sf-lovers » SF movies (ZARDOZ)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
SF movies (ZARDOZ) [message #117470] Mon, 23 September 2013 18:06 Go to next message
Anonymous
Karma:
Originally posted by: @RUTGERS.ARPA,@MIT-MC:INGRIA@MIT-OZ
Message-ID: <673@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 18-Feb-85 08:57:39 EST
Article-I.D.: topaz.673
Posted: Mon Feb 18 08:57:39 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Feb-85 03:36:24 EST
Sender: q@topaz.ARPA
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 41

From: INGRIA%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA

    Date: Wednesday, 13 February 1985  16:08-EST
    From: callaghan%pseudo.DEC at decwrl.ARPA (Gaylene Callaghan,      DTN:523-4523)
    To:   SF-LOVERS at MIT-MC
    Re:   SF movies

    In all this reminiscing, does anyone remember ZARDOZ or WIZARDS?
    (two of my all time favorites) Does anyone know where or if I can
    get them on tape? Also, I don't quite remember who wrote either one.
    Didn't Sean Connery star in ZARDOZ? (I could of sworn it was his
    gorgeous body I saw)

    Gaylene

Yes, that was Connery, playing Zed.  Charlotte Rampling also starred
in it.  I don't know if it's available on tape; it does occasionally
come on TV in these parts (Boston/Cambridge)---mangled brutally.
Since the ending involves some nudity and a (brief) childbirth scene,
the entire ending is CUT, making the TV version trail off
unintelligibly.  ZARDOZ was directed, if I remember correctly, by John
Boorman.  There is a novelization (also credited to Boorman, I
believe), which I have seen but not read.

Many critics panned ZARDOZ unmercifully when it came out.  One
reviewer suggested that they had taken it too seriously and that it
should be approached with tongue firmly in cheek.  And I think this is
true.  Even though the film deals with a serious subject---will
immortality and a danger-free environment prove self-defeating---it's
a bit difficult to take a movie completely seriously when its central
conceit is

***SPOILER-WARNING***

borrowed from the ``ignore the man behind the curtain'' line from the
Wizard of Oz (i.e. wiZARD of OZ).

-30-
Bob

``Meditate upon this at second level.''
Re: SF movies (ZARDOZ) [message #117588 is a reply to message #117470] Mon, 23 September 2013 18:22 Go to previous message
wombat is currently offline  wombat
Messages: 52
Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
Member
Message-ID: <22100038@ccvaxa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Feb-85 21:45:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.22100038
Posted: Fri Feb 22 21:45:00 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 26-Feb-85 08:03:06 EST
References: <673@topaz.UUCP>
Lines: 22
Nf-ID: #R:topaz:-67300:ccvaxa:22100038:000:782
Nf-From: ccvaxa!wombat    Feb 22 20:45:00 1985


/**** ccvaxa:net.sf-lovers / leeper@ahuta / 11:19 pm  Feb 20, 1985 ****/
 >Doesn't anyone remember A BOY AND HIS DOG?  Come on now!!
 >Gaylene
 >
Sure, I remember it.  The scenes above ground were decent.  Then it
turned into a pretentious bore.  This *thing* won the hugo based on
Harlan Ellison's name, but if it has been written by Otto Schwartz it
would be really forgotten by now.
				Mark Leeper
				...ihnp4!ahuta!leeper
/* ---------- */

Oh, I don't know. Even Michael Moorcock's name couldn't rescue *The Last
Days of Man on Earth* (based on *Breakfast in the Ruins*). Now that was an
absolutely awful movie.

"When you are about to die, a wombat is better than no company at all."
				Roger Zelazney, *Doorways in the Sand*

						Wombat
					ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!wombat
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: C.J.Cherryh books
Next Topic: Other Illuminatus Books
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Feb 02 23:37:20 EST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07437 seconds