Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ogicse!milton!oregon!rickm
From: rickm@oregon.uoregon.edu (Rick Millhollin)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: MicroEMACS vs VT200/300
Message-ID: <20390.2781c328@oregon.uoregon.edu>
Date: 2 Jan 91 19:25:28 GMT
References: <20371.27788c91@oregon.uoregon.edu> <20372.27788f7c@oregon.uoregon.edu> 
Distribution: comp,usa
Organization: University of Oregon
Lines: 21

Thanks for the many responses to my plea for help!  It turns out that there is
a simple two-line fix to VMS.C that will cure the problem.  Here is the DIFF:

************
File SYS$AUXDEVICE:[RICKM.EMACS]VMS.OLD_C;1
  491   		nxtkey->code = fn;
  492   		
******
File SYS$AUXDEVICE:[RICKM.EMACS]VMS.C;1
  491   		nxtkey->code = SPEC|fn;
  492   		
************

************
File SYS$AUXDEVICE:[RICKM.EMACS]VMS.OLD_C;1
  904   				vmsqin(cur->code);
******
File SYS$AUXDEVICE:[RICKM.EMACS]VMS.C;1
  904   				vmsqin(cur->code >> 8);
  905   				vmsqin(cur->code);
************