Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv
From: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Problems with MMDF and UUCP mail
Message-ID: 
Date: 13 Sep 90 00:04:56 GMT
References: <0ae6o2w163w@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <7921@gollum.twg.com>
	<1990Sep12.122549.21039@robobar.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@math.lsa.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan Math Dept., Ann Arbor MI.
Lines: 15
In-Reply-To: ronald@robobar.co.uk's message of 12 Sep 90 12:25:49 GMT

In article <1990Sep12.122549.21039@robobar.co.uk> ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo) writes:

   I *do* wish that MMDF workers would discuss their work openly in a USENET
   group, and am always grateful for the artcles on MMDF from DSH.  Is there
   a hysterical reason why MMDF *isn't* discussed on USENET ?  Where would
   be a good place to ask questions about it ?  (I have a few burning ones :-)

There's a 'bit.listserv.pmdf-l' group, but I don't see any mmdf lists on
a bit.* distribution.  No discussion of mmdf on pmdf-l to speak of, not
surprising.

Suggest that you agitate for a while, do a call for discussion, then a 
call for votes.  In 2 months time you'll have a group.

--Ed