| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) | Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers? | 1 Apr 88 22:35:56 GMT |
| WCSWR%CARLETON.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU (Walter Roberson) | ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 2 Apr 88 15:25:16 GMT |
| #YEUN14%UOFMCC.BITNET@MITVMA.MIT.EDU | mailing list | 4 Apr 88 04:03:03 GMT |
| SRA@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU (Rob Austein) | ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 4 Apr 88 07:36:38 GMT |
| DSDC-SDT2@GUNTER-ADAM.arpa (Walt Livingston) | remove from mailing list | 4 Apr 88 12:23:40 GMT |
| craig@NNSC.NSF.NET (Craig Partridge) | re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 4 Apr 88 14:00:31 GMT |
| cfe+@andrew.cmu.edu (Craig F. Everhart) | Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers? | 4 Apr 88 15:10:11 GMT |
| rick@seismo.CSS.GOV (Rick Adams) | re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 4 Apr 88 17:58:50 GMT |
| netinfo%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@violet.berkele (Postmaster & BITINFO) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 5 Apr 88 01:03:55 GMT |
| les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 5 Apr 88 02:39:47 GMT |
| jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 5 Apr 88 16:41:59 GMT |
| PKARP@IU.AI.SRI.COM (Peter Karp) | ! and @ | 5 Apr 88 19:16:54 GMT |
| jbs@fenchurch.MIT.EDU (Jeff Siegal) | Re: ! and @ | 6 Apr 88 03:46:44 GMT |
| tgt@cblpf.ATT.COM (Tim Thompson) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 6 Apr 88 02:55:40 GMT |
| dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 6 Apr 88 14:37:10 GMT |
| jsloan@wright.EDU (John Sloan) | Re: ! and @ | 6 Apr 88 11:00:42 GMT |
| wisner@eddie.MIT.EDU (Bill Wisner) | routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?) | 6 Apr 88 23:39:49 GMT |
| msir_ltd@ur-tut (Mark Sirota) | Ambiguous addresses (was: ! and @) | 7 Apr 88 00:08:39 GMT |
| les@chinet.UUCP (Leslie Mikesell) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 6 Apr 88 20:51:36 GMT |
| rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) | Re: routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?) | 7 Apr 88 13:59:02 GMT |
| jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 7 Apr 88 21:28:02 GMT |
| diamant@hpfclp.HP.COM (John Diamant) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 3 Apr 88 09:29:28 GMT |
| diamant@hpfclp.HP.COM (John Diamant) | Re: Ambiguous addresses (was: ! and @) | 7 Apr 88 02:46:21 GMT |
| Lennart_Lovstrand.EuroPARC@Xerox.COM | Re: ! and @ | 8 Apr 88 11:05:33 GMT |
| jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) | Re: routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?) | 8 Apr 88 18:19:19 GMT |
| rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) | Re: routes vs addresses (was Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ?) | 8 Apr 88 22:59:22 GMT |
| per@erix.UUCP (Per Hedeland) | Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers? | 11 Apr 88 10:21:56 GMT |
| jay@splut.UUCP (Jay Maynard) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 11 Apr 88 23:22:39 GMT |
| matt@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Matt Costello) | Humongous pathalias database | 13 Apr 88 04:08:08 GMT |
| cfe+@andrew.cmu.edu (Craig F. Everhart) | Re: Are underbars considered bad form for addresses in RFC822 headers? | 14 Apr 88 15:08:21 GMT |
| rpw3@amdcad.AMD.COM (Rob Warnock) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 15 Apr 88 04:59:39 GMT |
| chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg) | Re: ! and @ -- which RFC ? | 14 Apr 88 14:13:58 GMT |