Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sri-unix!gwyn@BRL.ARPA
From: gwyn@BRL.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re:  Why net.physics might be a forum for some psi discussion.
Message-ID: <423@sri-arpa.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 18-Jul-85 11:49:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.423
Posted: Thu Jul 18 11:49:18 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 12:17:42 EDT
Lines: 9

From:  Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) 

If there really is a definite, TESTABLE, proposal for interaction
of brain states with quantum states, be it called "psi" or not,
then, yes, that would be a good subject for informed discussion.
But if that is just another one of the "fundamental particle theory
proves that taoism was right" type of vague suggestions, it is not
sufficiently scientific to waste time on.  Let's try to keep to
matters that can be settled and not debate unexplained mysteries.