Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cadovax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cadovax!jefff
From: jefff@cadovax.UUCP (Jeffery H. Fields)
Newsgroups: net.astro
Subject: re: Science and Astrology
Message-ID: <729@cadovax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 15:58:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: cadovax.729
Posted: Fri Aug  2 15:58:54 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 4-Aug-85 10:45:30 EDT
Reply-To: jefff@cadovax.UUCP (Jeffery H. Fields)
Organization: Contel Cado, Torrance, CA
Lines: 14


>Lack of proof of existance does *NOT* constitute proof of lack of existance.
>Or did your scientific training skip over basic logic?
>
>				Sunny

I agree, but lack of proof is the antithesis of the scientific method.

-- 

				Jeff Fields
				{ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!jefff

Pax vobiscum.