Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf4.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!acf4!percus
From: percus@acf4.UUCP (Allon G. Percus)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Subject: Re: Problems with 1200 baud Kermit
Message-ID: <1000014@acf4.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 2-Jul-85 10:57:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: acf4.1000014
Posted: Tue Jul  2 10:57:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Jul-85 00:11:09 EDT
References: <180@cernvax.UUCP>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 11

I would suppose that the 64 would have MUCH trouble handling
1200 baud.  Remember, that's 1200 bps, or 150 characters per
second.  Very fast for the 64, considering that a routine
put in the interupt will only strike 60 times per second.
Hence, some sort of "wrinkle" is necessary to make things
faster by several orders of magnitude, and I don't think
KERMIT provides it.
                                         A. G. Percus
                                  (ARPA) percus@acf4
                                   (NYU) percus.acf4
                                  (UUCP) ...!ihnp4!cmcl2!acf4!percus