Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-bee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!ssc-bee!thill
From: thill@ssc-bee.UUCP (Tom Hill)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: "Hard Questions About Arms Control"
Message-ID: <311@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 26-Mar-85 11:31:39 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-bee.311
Posted: Tue Mar 26 11:31:39 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Mar-85 00:12:20 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA
Lines: 33


"Hard Questions About Arms Control" by Seymour Weiss is an article in
the March issue of Reader's Digest.  While I would hate to suggest that
a few net.posters read little and only that which they agree with,
I hope that a few of you take the time to find a copy and read it.
Just to get you interested...


"...the Soviets have used past agreements in a variety of ways:

	*   Agreements have been designed to sow political discord
	    between the United States and its allies...

	.
	.
	.

	*   Agreements can lull the United States into believing
	    that arms control reduces or even removes the need
	    for military preparedness. ..."


Take the time to read it, even if you don't agree with what it says
maybe it will help you pinpoint where you do stand.  While you are
at it you might also like to read the article titled "Disillusion
in Nicaragua."

Someone out there might even consider giving these articles as much
consideration as their own point of view.  Oh, how stupid of me, that
would be too much to ask.  Right sevener and Kelly.


Tom Hill