Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!cepu!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Origin of man
Message-ID: <1415@hao.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Mar-85 18:53:11 EST
Article-I.D.: hao.1415
Posted: Fri Mar 22 18:53:11 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 25-Mar-85 02:21:53 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 19

[]
> Apparently Adam and Eve existed. Did I miss some interesting
> scientific discovery? Is this an identity or perspectival(?) statement?
> I don't recall any of the other creationists on the net (even ICR)
> claiming the literal existence of Adam and Eve. Anybody care to
> provide scientific evidence for the existence of the ill-starred couple?

I think it's time to throw once more into the ring the notion
of the mitochondrial DNA that indicates (proves?) that at least
99% of all humans are descended from one female ancestor.

It was on the net about a year ago.  Anyone remember the details?
-- 

Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD
UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!ward
ARPA: hplabs!hao!ward@Berkeley
BELL: 303-497-1252
USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO  80307