Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!cbosgd!cbsck!cbscc!pmd From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Re. Bishop Ussher and the age of the earth,etc. Message-ID: <4992@cbscc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 15-Mar-85 14:45:17 EST Article-I.D.: cbscc.4992 Posted: Fri Mar 15 14:45:17 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 16-Mar-85 05:32:20 EST References: <1041@decwrl.UUCP>, <1094@utastro.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 21 {Padraig Houlahan:} >OK. I understand now. When the bible says that the earth is flat then >the 'literal' interpretation is the earth only appeared to be flat. >And when the bible says that Jesus was the Son of God, the >'literal' interpretation is that He only APPEARED to be the Son of God. >Sounds reasonable to me. A real literary critic we have here, implying perspectival statements must be interpreted in the same sense as statements of identity. If the subject of your mockery wasn't the Bible your foolishness might be more apparent to you. I suppose you never speak of the sunset as such? And when you drive into a gas station asking directions you want them in stellar coordinates. Either that or, for consistency's sake, you only claim to *appear* to be Padraig Houlahan. Ken Arndt is making a lot more sense than you, fella (Maybe you should be worried? :-)). -- Paul Dubuc (not DuBois) cbscc!pmd