Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amdcad!amd!dual!mordor!ut-sally!ut-ngp!lindley
From: lindley@ut-ngp.UUCP (John L. Templer)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: heterosex
Message-ID: <1296@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 8-Feb-85 21:14:37 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.1296
Posted: Fri Feb  8 21:14:37 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 11-Feb-85 13:32:07 EST
References: <514@hou5g.UUCP> <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: U.Texas Physics Department; Austin, Texas
Lines: 27

> From: mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate)
> Summary: Shows BIG flaws
> 
> Well, enough of this.  I can only read this "questionnaire" as an attempt
> to make people who feel a moral repugnance towards the PRACTICE of 
> homosexuality to feel guilty.  By inverting a number of serious questions
> concerning homosexuality, the author attempts to make the original questions
> look rediculous.  Fortunately for reason, the sheer numerical superiority of
> heterosexuality shows the absurdity of the thing for what it is.
> 
> Charley Wingate   umcp-cs!mangoe

It seems to me that there is a double standard being applied here.
First you say the article "Shows BIG flaws", then you claim that
similar questions concerning homosexuality are "serious".  I am not
sure *what* you mean by that last sentence, possibly that because
heterosexuals are in the majority, then *obviously* they are better,
superior, more moral, etc.

-- 

                                           John L. Templer
                                     University of Texas at Austin

    {allegra,gatech,seismo!ut-sally,vortex}!ut-ngp!lindley

                 "and they called it, yuppy love."