Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unm-cvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!unmvax!unm-cvax!cs2534ai From: cs2534ai@unm-cvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.apple Subject: Re: Can a 65C02 be used in an Apple ][? Message-ID: <241@unm-cvax.UUCP> Date: Sun, 10-Feb-85 18:46:19 EST Article-I.D.: unm-cvax.241 Posted: Sun Feb 10 18:46:19 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 13-Feb-85 03:30:32 EST References: <> Reply-To: cs2534ai@unm-cvax.UUCP (David Thomas) Distribution: net Organization: Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque Lines: 30 Summary: ** UNABLE TO LOAD PRODOS ** In article <> joeloda@aicchi.UUCP (Joseph D. Loda) writes: >Can a 65C02 microprocessor be used to replace the "standard" 6502 processor >in an Apple ][ or ][+? If so, are there any problems that may offset the >benefits? Thanks in advance. Rumor has it that soon all Apple //e's will be shipped with the new 65C02 microprocessor and the //c ROMs (much improved over the //e ones) as standard equipment. Also, you will be able to obtain //c ROMs and 65C02 to install in your present Apple //e. Apple has other things on it's mind right now, so it may be a while yet (several months) before these things come to pass. This mod applies to the //e only, by the way. -DT [The Deranged Terrestrial] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ::::::::: ___________HOME___________ ::::: ::::: _____________WORK_______________ David B. Thomas ::___ ___:: Rocky Mountain Computers (Apple) 1406 Calle Del Ranchero NE ::\_*|-|_*/:: 2109 Wyoming Blvd. NE Albuquerque, NM 87106 :: \_/ :: Albuquerque, NM 87112 (505) 266-1016 : (___) : (505) 292-2775 that's 292-APPL :_______: UUCP: {{purdue,cmcl2,ihnp4}!lanl,ucbvax}!unmvax!unm-cvax!cs2534ai --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Sea Dragon...Seeeeea Dragon...SEEEEEA DRAGON!"