Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice6.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice6!daf From: daf@ccice6.UUCP (David Fader) Newsgroups: net.women,net.abortion,net.politics Subject: re: re: a pro abortion argument Message-ID: <325@ccice6.UUCP> Date: Tue, 5-Feb-85 12:25:32 EST Article-I.D.: ccice6.325 Posted: Tue Feb 5 12:25:32 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 8-Feb-85 02:03:44 EST References: <4680@cbscc.UUCP> <1361@hao.UUCP> Organization: The Wall Of Fog Lines: 22 Xref: watmath net.women:4397 net.abortion:1195 net.politics:7408 > > Yes, there is brain activity in a fetus before the 28th week, but > > it is not brain activity definitive of homo-sapiens. Sorry for > > the confusion. > > Is it the case that this activity is not definitive of homo-sapiens, > or that our measuring tools are not capable of determining definitions > of species specific brain activities in fetuses? > > Without taking any side on the issue of abortion, I find it dificult > to believe that the brain activity of any species would not be > different from that of all others. > > Just a hunch. > You are entitled to your opinion that the human brain is no different from the brains of animals. Your attempts to prove your brain is no better than an animal brain by posting articles in the wrong newsgroup is taking the argument too far. Don't you agree. -- The Watcher seismo!rochester!ccice5!ccice6!daf