Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA
From: MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: ...
Message-ID: <8130@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 8-Feb-85 08:02:59 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.8130
Posted: Fri Feb  8 08:02:59 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 04:11:07 EST
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 9


	i have to agree with jsdy here, in regards to a line or two of
the message being reffered to being inserted, some ptr as to the
relevancy of the message can help keep things straight.  however the
inclusion of the entire text of a message when only a small fraction
is relevant is too much. i read my mail at 300 baud and i can't really
say that i like reading the same message n times.

                      shades%mit-oz.mit-mc.arpa