Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Dinsdale Piranha)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Honesty
Message-ID: <485@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-Feb-85 11:59:44 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.485
Posted: Thu Feb  7 11:59:44 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Feb-85 05:41:00 EST
References: <968@utastro.UUCP> <4565@cbscc.UUCP> <1012@utastro.UUCP> <4639@cbscc.UUCP>, <330@cybvax0.UUCP> <4724@cbscc.UUCP>
Organization: The Gang - Other Other Operations Division
Lines: 14

> Letters to journals hardly constitute scientific review.  In paticular they
> don't do much to expose things like faked data.  A good scientific review
> process involves scrutiny of work by one's peers before anything is even
> published.  [PAUL DUBUC]

I wonder how much work Paul (and others like him) have done in examining
whether or not HIS sources (e.g., very old books) contain "faked data",
or made-up stories, or propaganda, or ...

Or is that not necessary?
-- 
BRIAN:  "You're all different!"
CROWD:  "YES, WE'RE ALL DIFFERENT!"			Rich Rosen
MAN:    "I'm not ... "			     {ihnp4 | harpo}!pyuxd!rlr