Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site drivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!cord!bentley!hoxna!houxm!whuxlm!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!amdahl!drivax!sharpe
From: sharpe@drivax.UUCP (Andrew Sharpe)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: XENIX for ATT PC6300
Message-ID: <92@drivax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 7-Feb-85 11:58:52 EST
Article-I.D.: drivax.92
Posted: Thu Feb  7 11:58:52 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 06:23:25 EST
References: <8737@microsoft.UUCP>
Organization: Digital Research, Monterey, CA
Lines: 22

> Microsoft reaffirmed its committment to the introduction of a System V
> compatible version of XENIX; AT&T and Microsoft are working together to
> define the Verification Service by which UNIX derived products are 
> tested to ensure conformance with the System V Interface Definition.
> Microsoft has been designated, by AT&T, as the pilot participant in the
> Verification Service and XENIX is expected to be the first microcomputer
> UNIX derivative to be so verified.
> 	....!decvax!microsoft!adriank

So how come all the generic ports were validated with AT&T URTS, and XENIX
gets to have their own? Could it be that they can't pass the URTS?

-- 
                                               _____________
                                              / |  _______  |
                                             |  |  |__ / |  |
	        Andrew Sharpe                |  |  |  |  |  |
                                             |  |  |  |  |  |
{ ihnp4, mot, ucscc, amdahl } !drivax!sharpe |  |  |__|  |  |
	                                     |  | /   |  |  |
	                                     |  -------  | /
	                                     -------------