Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site wlcrjs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!hoxna!houxm!mhuxj!mhuxm!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ihnp4!wlcrjs!zubbie From: zubbie@wlcrjs.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck) Newsgroups: net.nlang,net.women Subject: Re: the word "love" in English vs Hungarian Message-ID: <552@wlcrjs.UUCP> Date: Sat, 9-Feb-85 11:29:16 EST Article-I.D.: wlcrjs.552 Posted: Sat Feb 9 11:29:16 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 06:31:50 EST References: <116@rtech.ARPA> Reply-To: zubbie@wlcrjs.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck) Distribution: net Organization: chi-net, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL Lines: 16 Xref: watmath net.nlang:2560 net.women:4427 Summary: I think language has a lot to do withthe behavioral development of society and the people as individuals. I do not think having to words for love would really help, not because the idea has no value but because the problem of defining what goes into each catagory might create more trouble than was originally in place. I refer those who might disagree with me on this to the trouble we here are having defing the differences, and/or requirements for determining them, between erotica and pornigraphy. =============================================================================== From the mostly vacant environment of Jeanette L. Zobjeck (ihnp4!wlcrjs!zubbie) All opinions expressed may not even be my own. ===============================================================================