Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!hoxna!houxm!mhuxj!mhuxm!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Dinsdale Piranha)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: First answer EVER to natural/supernatural question
Message-ID: <504@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 9-Feb-85 18:20:34 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.504
Posted: Sat Feb  9 18:20:34 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 06:34:45 EST
References: <1552V6M@PSUVM> <453@pyuxd.UUCP> <311@psivax.UUCP>
Organization: The Gang - Other Other Operations Division
Lines: 15

> I define "natural" to mean everything within the space-time
> continuum we call "the universe". This definition is different
> from that of many other Christians in that by this definition
> angels(given that they exist) are *natural*.  What then could
> be "suprnatural"?  Well if you will think about it, it is clear
> that the creator of the universe must *by definition* be outside
> of the structure of the universe, that is since he *made* the
> structure we call space-time he must be external to it.  Thus I
> accept only *one* supernatural thing, the creator, who I believe
> to be the God of the Bible.

What is the boundary between the "universe" and "outside of the universe"?
If not just another arbitrary anthropocentric one?
-- 
"I don't understand.  Is it modern?"		Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr