Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site drivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!cord!bentley!hoxna!houxm!whuxlm!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!amdahl!drivax!sharpe From: sharpe@drivax.UUCP (Andrew Sharpe) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: XENIX for ATT PC6300 Message-ID: <92@drivax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 7-Feb-85 11:58:52 EST Article-I.D.: drivax.92 Posted: Thu Feb 7 11:58:52 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 06:23:25 EST References: <8737@microsoft.UUCP> Organization: Digital Research, Monterey, CA Lines: 22 > Microsoft reaffirmed its committment to the introduction of a System V > compatible version of XENIX; AT&T and Microsoft are working together to > define the Verification Service by which UNIX derived products are > tested to ensure conformance with the System V Interface Definition. > Microsoft has been designated, by AT&T, as the pilot participant in the > Verification Service and XENIX is expected to be the first microcomputer > UNIX derivative to be so verified. > ....!decvax!microsoft!adriank So how come all the generic ports were validated with AT&T URTS, and XENIX gets to have their own? Could it be that they can't pass the URTS? -- _____________ / | _______ | | | |__ / | | Andrew Sharpe | | | | | | | | | | | | { ihnp4, mot, ucscc, amdahl } !drivax!sharpe | | |__| | | | | / | | | | ------- | / -------------