Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rna.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!rna!dan From: dan@rna.UUCP (Dan Ts'o) Newsgroups: net.graphics,net.info-terms Subject: Comparison ? REGIS, TEK4027, TEK4105 Message-ID: <367@rna.UUCP> Date: Tue, 12-Feb-85 23:27:15 EST Article-I.D.: rna.367 Posted: Tue Feb 12 23:27:15 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Feb-85 03:16:17 EST Organization: Rockefeller Neurobiology, NYC Lines: 18 Xref: watmath net.graphics:627 net.info-terms:490 x Can anyone evaluate the similarities, differences and relative merits of the three graphics protocols: REGIS, TEK4027, TEK4105 ? The specific reason of interest is that I am evaluating a Digital Engineering HiSCAN graphics terminal which has (eventually) the possibility of emulating any of the above three protocols in addition to the standard monochrome TEK4010/4014. I have never show great interest in REGIS but remain open to it. I am completely ignorant of the differences between the TEK4027 and TEK4105. Thanks for the info. Cheers, Dan Ts'o Dept. Neurobiology Rockefeller Univ. 1230 York Ave. NY, NY 10021 212-570-7671 ...cmcl2!rna!dan