Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: heterosex
Message-ID: <4998@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Feb-85 21:51:42 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.4998
Posted: Mon Feb 11 21:51:42 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 12-Feb-85 06:46:26 EST
References: <514@hou5g.UUCP> <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower)
Distribution: na
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 20
Summary: 

In article <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP> mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) writes:
>Well, enough of this.  I can only read this "questionnaire" as an attempt
>to make people who feel a moral repugnance towards the PRACTICE of 
>homosexuality to feel guilty.  By inverting a number of serious questions
>concerning homosexuality, the author attempts to make the original questions
>look rediculous.  Fortunately for reason, the sheer numerical superiority of
>heterosexuality shows the absurdity of the thing for what it is.
>
>Charley Wingate   umcp-cs!mangoe

It was probabally meant to show the absurdity of these types of questions.
I am frequently asked these types of questions though, so why shouldn't
the tables be reversed.

As for your last sentence:
Is your fear of practicing homosexuality based on the fact the you are afraid
of what the neighbors will say?  Does numerical superiority imply better?
-- 
Richard A. Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower