Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA From: MLY.G.SHADES%MIT-OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: ... Message-ID: <8130@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Fri, 8-Feb-85 08:02:59 EST Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.8130 Posted: Fri Feb 8 08:02:59 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 04:11:07 EST Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Organization: Ballistic Research Lab Lines: 9 i have to agree with jsdy here, in regards to a line or two of the message being reffered to being inserted, some ptr as to the relevancy of the message can help keep things straight. however the inclusion of the entire text of a message when only a small fraction is relevant is too much. i read my mail at 300 baud and i can't really say that i like reading the same message n times. shades%mit-oz.mit-mc.arpa