Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hcrvx1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!hcrvax!hcrvx1!hugh
From: hugh@hcrvx1.UUCP (Hugh Redelmeier)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Proposed group net.micro.defunct
Message-ID: <1113@hcrvx1.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 11-Feb-85 11:37:32 EST
Article-I.D.: hcrvx1.1113
Posted: Mon Feb 11 11:37:32 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 12-Feb-85 03:12:08 EST
References: <264@wdl1.UUCP>
Reply-To: hugh@unix.UUCP (Hugh Redelmeier)
Organization: Human Computing Resources, Toronto
Lines: 13
Summary: 

In article <264@wdl1.UUCP> jbn@wdl1.UUCP writes:
>
>     How about a group net.micro.defunct for owners of those golden oldies
>like the Coleco Adam, the National Semiconductor Pace, the Victor 9000, and
>the Osborne I, all of which have come up here recently.
>     The moderator for this group should be an Altair owner.


I second this.  I have a Nabu 1600 (defunct), a "four user"
8086 system.  On it I have two Volker-Craig 2100 terminals (defunct).
I have a Kaypro II (not yet defunct, but there are rumours).
Oh yes: I have an Altair 8800 (defunct) too.  Does any hardware vendor
want to bribe me NOT to buy their machine???