Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!cbscc!pmd
From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc)
Newsgroups: net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Hutch on "impoliteness" (part B)
Message-ID: <4787@cbscc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Feb-85 15:24:38 EST
Article-I.D.: cbscc.4787
Posted: Tue Feb 12 15:24:38 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Feb-85 00:58:39 EST
References: <428@pyuxd.UUCP> <1777@pucc-h> <457@pyuxd.UUCP> <1247@shark.UUCP>, <519@pyuxd.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus
Lines: 25


Rich Rosen:

>I *have* indeed used net.religion for discussions of religions in general,
>and have crossposted to net.religion.christian (or followed up there) where
>appropriate.  My argument is not with Christians, but with particular notions
>of religion in general.  It is certain Christians who seem to have an argument
>with me.
   ...
>On closer examination, I checked the last five articles (not including today's)
>to see where the "impoliteness" lay:
   ...
><458@pyuxd.UUCP> - a response to Dubuc's arrogance that may be construed as
>	"impolite"; though I wonder what adjective would then apply to Paul's
>	articles... ?

I don't have any argument with you, Rich.  You seem to like to "respond"
to my comments directed toward others, though.  I think they can do pretty
well without your help, don't you?  Yeah, I know, I'm arrogant and you're
only impolite, sure.  But let *them* tell me if they think so, OK?  I know
what you think about what I write.

-- 

Paul Dubuc	cbscc!pmd