Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: the GREAT MARCHIONNI replies  (all bow....:-)   )))
Message-ID: <662@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 6-Feb-85 12:26:33 EST
Article-I.D.: ccice5.662
Posted: Wed Feb  6 12:26:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 9-Feb-85 06:23:09 EST
References: <1534V6M@PSUVM> <787@druxo.UUCP> <654@ccice5.UUCP> <315@ccice6.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 27

> Well Rob, I see you have fled across the news groups in
> an attempt to elude me. Alas I have found you and must
> once again respond.
> I suspect women could always hunt. (excluding blind paraplegics) Society
> probably didn't allow them to. Possibly this isn't the point you intended.
> Get fire from a waring clan for the cave? I must advise you not to see
> "Quest For Fire" again until you are less impressionable.
> I think effective methods of birth control came after Christianity, at
> least on earth.
> Hopefully you will explain what these random examples have to do with
> the claim that Christianity reenforces the second class status of women.
> Are you saying that you don't detest wars that cause inequality?
> Do you detest wars that cause equality? Please explain.
> Look now, the fact that you have gone on for several sentences is no
> reason to totally forget the original point.
> Perhaps there is minor jump in logic here.
> Is the part where you tie all this together into a salient point
> coming in some future article?
> -- 
> The Watcher
> seismo!rochester!ccice5!ccice6!daf

David, what a silly article.  This makes no sense at all.  Oh, I see.  I
wasn't supposed to take the statements out of context.  I was supposed to
read the article as a whole.  Silly me!

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***