Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!cbscc!pmd From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc) Newsgroups: net.religion.christian Subject: Re: Hutch on "impoliteness" (part B) Message-ID: <4787@cbscc.UUCP> Date: Tue, 12-Feb-85 15:24:38 EST Article-I.D.: cbscc.4787 Posted: Tue Feb 12 15:24:38 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Feb-85 00:58:39 EST References: <428@pyuxd.UUCP> <1777@pucc-h> <457@pyuxd.UUCP> <1247@shark.UUCP>, <519@pyuxd.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 25 Rich Rosen: >I *have* indeed used net.religion for discussions of religions in general, >and have crossposted to net.religion.christian (or followed up there) where >appropriate. My argument is not with Christians, but with particular notions >of religion in general. It is certain Christians who seem to have an argument >with me. ... >On closer examination, I checked the last five articles (not including today's) >to see where the "impoliteness" lay: ... ><458@pyuxd.UUCP> - a response to Dubuc's arrogance that may be construed as > "impolite"; though I wonder what adjective would then apply to Paul's > articles... ? I don't have any argument with you, Rich. You seem to like to "respond" to my comments directed toward others, though. I think they can do pretty well without your help, don't you? Yeah, I know, I'm arrogant and you're only impolite, sure. But let *them* tell me if they think so, OK? I know what you think about what I write. -- Paul Dubuc cbscc!pmd