Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site topaz.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!topaz!@RUTGERS.ARPA,@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA:QU229C@GWUVM From: @RUTGERS.ARPA,@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA:QU229C@GWUVM Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Dr. Who vs. Star Trek & worst Sci-Fi movie. Message-ID: <612@topaz.ARPA> Date: Wed, 13-Feb-85 09:20:16 EST Article-I.D.: topaz.612 Posted: Wed Feb 13 09:20:16 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 14-Feb-85 01:31:55 EST Sender: daemon@topaz.ARPA Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 25 From: Jonathan CohnMy roomate comments: "A correction must be made. Dr. Who fans are whovians not whovites. The main difference between Trekies and Whovians is that Whovians are more mature. For all fans the doctor's full name is Hurnjobadapelanndevaxsisi." On the matter of the worst SF movie: "Starcrossed is the worst all time Sci-fi movie. It gets my award for best pyrotecnic display doing the least amount of damage." I am not positive I got the spelling of that name correct but no matter, it is something similar if not that exactly. No wonder everyone calls him "The doctor". B.T.W. Washington D.C. no longer has broadcasts of either Dr. Who or Star Trek leaving the nations capital with a 2 poor current SF programs. ("V", and "Otherworld") Jonathan Cohn BITNET::JC595C@GWUVM or QU229C@GWUVM ATT:: (201) 676-2353 <> Acknowledge-To: