Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site wlcrjs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!hoxna!houxm!mhuxj!mhuxm!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ihnp4!wlcrjs!zubbie
From: zubbie@wlcrjs.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck)
Newsgroups: net.nlang,net.women
Subject: Re: the word "love" in English vs Hungarian
Message-ID: <552@wlcrjs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 9-Feb-85 11:29:16 EST
Article-I.D.: wlcrjs.552
Posted: Sat Feb  9 11:29:16 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 06:31:50 EST
References: <116@rtech.ARPA>
Reply-To: zubbie@wlcrjs.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck)
Distribution: net
Organization: chi-net, Public Access UN*X, Chicago IL
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.nlang:2560 net.women:4427
Summary: 

I think language has a lot to do withthe behavioral development of
society and the people as individuals.
I do not think having to words for love would really help, not because
the idea has no value but because the problem of defining what goes
into each catagory might create more trouble than was originally in place.
I refer those who might disagree with me on this to the trouble we here
are having defing the differences, and/or requirements for determining
them, between erotica and pornigraphy.

===============================================================================
From the mostly vacant environment of  Jeanette L. Zobjeck (ihnp4!wlcrjs!zubbie)

All opinions expressed may not even be my own.
===============================================================================