Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rna.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!rna!dan
From: dan@rna.UUCP (Dan Ts'o)
Newsgroups: net.graphics,net.info-terms
Subject: Comparison ? REGIS, TEK4027, TEK4105
Message-ID: <367@rna.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 12-Feb-85 23:27:15 EST
Article-I.D.: rna.367
Posted: Tue Feb 12 23:27:15 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 14-Feb-85 03:16:17 EST
Organization: Rockefeller Neurobiology, NYC
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.graphics:627 net.info-terms:490

x
	Can anyone evaluate the similarities, differences and relative merits
of the three graphics protocols: REGIS, TEK4027, TEK4105 ?
	The specific reason of interest is that I am evaluating a Digital
Engineering HiSCAN graphics terminal which has (eventually) the possibility
of emulating any of the above three protocols in addition to the standard
monochrome TEK4010/4014.
	I have never show great interest in REGIS but remain open to it. I am
completely ignorant of the differences between the TEK4027 and TEK4105.
	Thanks for the info.
					Cheers,
					Dan Ts'o
					Dept. Neurobiology
					Rockefeller Univ.
					1230 York Ave.
					NY, NY 10021
					212-570-7671
					...cmcl2!rna!dan