Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!godot!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!jlg From: jlg@lanl.ARPA Newsgroups: net.med Subject: Re: Re: Unconventional Cancer Therapy Message-ID: <21177@lanl.ARPA> Date: Thu, 7-Feb-85 00:13:40 EST Article-I.D.: lanl.21177 Posted: Thu Feb 7 00:13:40 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Feb-85 08:22:33 EST References: <532@tesla.UUCP> <690@wucs.UUCP> <1128@aecom.UUCP> Sender: newsreader@lanl.ARPA Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Lines: 16 > > > Is there anyone out there following the Gerson Cancer Therapy method? > > > The Gerson doctors claim a cure rate of over 60% - for people who are > > > in advanced stages of cancer, There are two types of 'cures' for cancer. 1) someone undergoes treatment and is later found free of the disease. 2) someone is examined 5 (or more) years later and is still free of the disease. Which one does the above claim refer to? Where is their data (ie. can any or the rest of the medical community get access to it - if it's locked in a safe at some medical center it's pretty useless)? Where is your evidence to support the claim that the general medical community is ignoring the method? Maybe a lot of doctors are applying a variation of the method as part of a more conventional treatment (nutrition is not as foreign to the medical community as you make out). J. Giles