Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hcrvx1.UUCP Path: utzoo!hcrvax!hcrvx1!hugh From: hugh@hcrvx1.UUCP (Hugh Redelmeier) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: Proposed group net.micro.defunct Message-ID: <1113@hcrvx1.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Feb-85 11:37:32 EST Article-I.D.: hcrvx1.1113 Posted: Mon Feb 11 11:37:32 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 12-Feb-85 03:12:08 EST References: <264@wdl1.UUCP> Reply-To: hugh@unix.UUCP (Hugh Redelmeier) Organization: Human Computing Resources, Toronto Lines: 13 Summary: In article <264@wdl1.UUCP> jbn@wdl1.UUCP writes: > > How about a group net.micro.defunct for owners of those golden oldies >like the Coleco Adam, the National Semiconductor Pace, the Victor 9000, and >the Osborne I, all of which have come up here recently. > The moderator for this group should be an Altair owner. I second this. I have a Nabu 1600 (defunct), a "four user" 8086 system. On it I have two Volker-Craig 2100 terminals (defunct). I have a Kaypro II (not yet defunct, but there are rumours). Oh yes: I have an Altair 8800 (defunct) too. Does any hardware vendor want to bribe me NOT to buy their machine???