Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: the GREAT MARCHIONNI replies (all bow....:-) ))) Message-ID: <662@ccice5.UUCP> Date: Wed, 6-Feb-85 12:26:33 EST Article-I.D.: ccice5.662 Posted: Wed Feb 6 12:26:33 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 9-Feb-85 06:23:09 EST References: <1534V6M@PSUVM> <787@druxo.UUCP> <654@ccice5.UUCP> <315@ccice6.UUCP> Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY Lines: 27 > Well Rob, I see you have fled across the news groups in > an attempt to elude me. Alas I have found you and must > once again respond. > I suspect women could always hunt. (excluding blind paraplegics) Society > probably didn't allow them to. Possibly this isn't the point you intended. > Get fire from a waring clan for the cave? I must advise you not to see > "Quest For Fire" again until you are less impressionable. > I think effective methods of birth control came after Christianity, at > least on earth. > Hopefully you will explain what these random examples have to do with > the claim that Christianity reenforces the second class status of women. > Are you saying that you don't detest wars that cause inequality? > Do you detest wars that cause equality? Please explain. > Look now, the fact that you have gone on for several sentences is no > reason to totally forget the original point. > Perhaps there is minor jump in logic here. > Is the part where you tie all this together into a salient point > coming in some future article? > -- > The Watcher > seismo!rochester!ccice5!ccice6!daf David, what a silly article. This makes no sense at all. Oh, I see. I wasn't supposed to take the statements out of context. I was supposed to read the article as a whole. Silly me! *** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***