Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!ucbvax!medin
From: medin@ucbvax.ARPA (Milo Medin)
Newsgroups: net.sources,net.unix-wizards,net.unix
Subject: Re: Netd (Part 2 of 2)
Message-ID: <4714@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Sun, 10-Feb-85 13:51:27 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.4714
Posted: Sun Feb 10 13:51:27 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 11-Feb-85 06:49:24 EST
References: <239@cadre.ARPA> <4624@ucbvax.ARPA> <124@tove.UUCP>
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 23
Xref: watmath net.sources:2563 net.unix-wizards:11977 net.unix:3574

> How about leaking some ordering information ahead of time so those of us
> with incredibily long lead times to P.O. or license signature can
> try to get the ball rolling?
> New license needed?
> Cost?
> 
> -- 
> Spoken: Mark Weiser 	ARPA:	mark@maryland	Phone: +1-301-454-7817
> CSNet:	mark@umcp-cs 	UUCP:	{seismo,allegra}!umcp-cs!mark
> USPS: Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

Well, what can I say?  I mentioned that to prevent some waste
of people's time.  I know certain things about the release, but
I am not part of the group that is involved with the distribution.
I am sure when the time comes people will know about it.  If
you saw the paper in last summer's usenix conference about 
performance increases, thats all in there, plus a bit more.
It's well worth upgrading to in my opinion.  But as I am not
part of the distribution group, it would be inappropriate to
comment on P.O.'s or new licensing requirements.  

				Milo