Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!hoxna!houxm!mhuxj!mhuxm!mhuxn!mhuxb!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Dinsdale Piranha) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: First answer EVER to natural/supernatural question Message-ID: <504@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Sat, 9-Feb-85 18:20:34 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxd.504 Posted: Sat Feb 9 18:20:34 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Feb-85 06:34:45 EST References: <1552V6M@PSUVM> <453@pyuxd.UUCP> <311@psivax.UUCP> Organization: The Gang - Other Other Operations Division Lines: 15 > I define "natural" to mean everything within the space-time > continuum we call "the universe". This definition is different > from that of many other Christians in that by this definition > angels(given that they exist) are *natural*. What then could > be "suprnatural"? Well if you will think about it, it is clear > that the creator of the universe must *by definition* be outside > of the structure of the universe, that is since he *made* the > structure we call space-time he must be external to it. Thus I > accept only *one* supernatural thing, the creator, who I believe > to be the God of the Bible. What is the boundary between the "universe" and "outside of the universe"? If not just another arbitrary anthropocentric one? -- "I don't understand. Is it modern?" Rich Rosen pyuxd!rlr