Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!ihnp4!fortune!brower From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: heterosex Message-ID: <4998@fortune.UUCP> Date: Mon, 11-Feb-85 21:51:42 EST Article-I.D.: fortune.4998 Posted: Mon Feb 11 21:51:42 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 12-Feb-85 06:46:26 EST References: <514@hou5g.UUCP> <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower) Distribution: na Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA Lines: 20 Summary: In article <3087@umcp-cs.UUCP> mangoe@umcp-cs.UUCP (Charley Wingate) writes: >Well, enough of this. I can only read this "questionnaire" as an attempt >to make people who feel a moral repugnance towards the PRACTICE of >homosexuality to feel guilty. By inverting a number of serious questions >concerning homosexuality, the author attempts to make the original questions >look rediculous. Fortunately for reason, the sheer numerical superiority of >heterosexuality shows the absurdity of the thing for what it is. > >Charley Wingate umcp-cs!mangoe It was probabally meant to show the absurdity of these types of questions. I am frequently asked these types of questions though, so why shouldn't the tables be reversed. As for your last sentence: Is your fear of practicing homosexuality based on the fact the you are afraid of what the neighbors will say? Does numerical superiority imply better? -- Richard A. Brower Fortune Systems {ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower