Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekecs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!jeffw From: jeffw@tekecs.UUCP (Jeff Winslow) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Women's body parts - clarification Message-ID: <3986@tekecs.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Aug-84 19:34:53 EDT Article-I.D.: tekecs.3986 Posted: Mon Aug 20 19:34:53 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Aug-84 01:17:37 EDT References: <3971@tekecs.UUCP>, <1849@stolaf.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 8 Tom: It was asserted that *the* reason certain pictures were degrading is that they showed only parts of women's bodies. Period. The point of the counterexample was to show this was not always true, since it is highly unlikely the photographer was promoting such things. Therefore, if the counterexample is to be taken seriously, the original assertion is false. Jeff Winslow