Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1.chuqui 4/7/84; site nsc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!nsc!chuqui
From: chuqui@nsc.UUCP (Chuq)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Questions on films
Message-ID: <1306@nsc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 14-Aug-84 14:02:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: nsc.1306
Posted: Tue Aug 14 14:02:34 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 15-Aug-84 01:42:54 EDT
Organization: Bryn Myrrdin
Lines: 22

Having just purchased an AE1P (highly recommended) and getting back into 
the hobby after a number of years, I'm interested in knowing what films
people out there prefer and why. When I last visited photography Tri-X was
considered to be ultrafast (so was Kodacolor 100...).

My preferences are to natural light photography, a lot of it is done in
somewhat dim surroundings. I also do nature work. I'm currently using
Kodacolor 400/1000 print films. My questions, basically, are: is there a
decent equivalent slide film? Is there going to be a noticeable grain
difference between 400 or 1000 and a 100 speed film? As I'm also interested
in doing some astral work (I have a friend with a good telescope) what
kinds of films should I consider for that?

chuq

-- 
From the depths of the Crystal Cavern:		Chuq Von Rospach
{amd,decwrl,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4}!nsc!chuqui	nsc!chuqui@decwrl.ARPA

Dreams, dreams, enchanter! Gone with the harp's echo when the strings fall
mute; with the flame's shadow when the fire dies. Be still, and listen.