Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!jeff
From: jeff@dciem.UUCP (Jeff Richardson)
Newsgroups: can.politics
Subject: Re: The non-interference society; judgement in haste?
Message-ID: <1064@dciem.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-Aug-84 16:25:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: dciem.1064
Posted: Tue Aug 21 16:25:27 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Aug-84 18:53:44 EDT
References: <999@hcrvax.UUCP>, <8680@watmath.UUCP>, <4226@utzoo.UUCP>, <8700@watmath.UUCP>, <8712@watmath.UUCP>
Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada
Lines: 13

The "traditional" (as Ian! calls it) system of having governments make
decisions for us for the benefit of society makes sense, but only when it
is necessary to do so.  The problem is that Canada's governments have been
making far too many decisions for us unneccessarily, and many of them are
of questionable benefit to society.  I know you're going to ask me how to
determine when it's necessary for the government to make a decision for us,
and I agree that it's not always easy, but the line has to be drawn somewhere
and I think it should have been drawn a long time ago.  By the way, I don't
expect the situation to get any better, regardless of who is elected.
-- 
Jeff Richardson, DCIEM, Toronto  (416) 635-2073
{linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd}!utcsrgv!dciem!jeff
{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!dciem!jeff