Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!jejones
From: jejones@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Lockport Blast: safety of oi - (nf)
Message-ID: <3400018@ea.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-Aug-84 16:54:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.3400018
Posted: Fri Aug  3 16:54:00 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 6-Aug-84 06:59:06 EDT
References: <447@tty3b.UUCP>
Lines: 13
Nf-ID: #R:tty3b:-44700:ea:3400018:000:472
Nf-From: ea!jejones    Aug  3 15:54:00 1984

#R:tty3b:-44700:ea:3400018:000:472
ea!jejones    Aug  3 15:54:00 1984

What ea!mwm says is true, however, lest the anti-nuke bozos flame about the
linear assumption, let what should be obvious be known, namely that the
linear assumption is a more cautious one than that of a threshold, and is
the one used in practice, so it doesn't really matter whether a threshold
exists for purposes of the nuclear monologue (as Petr Beckmann calls it).

				Socrates drank organically-grown hemlock
				(which has an infinite half-life),

				James Jones