Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site randvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall From: edhall@randvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Foreget Reagan, Forget Mondale, Forget Hart Message-ID: <1856@randvax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Jul-84 18:55:23 EDT Article-I.D.: randvax.1856 Posted: Thu Jul 26 18:55:23 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 21:05:37 EDT References: <1072@hao.UUCP> <894@pyuxa.UUCP> <214@fisher.UUCP>, <116@bsdgvax.UUCP> Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica Lines: 23 > .... The question is: Is the person qualified for the job? We're > talking about a 3-term congresswoman who hasn't had a piece of her > legislation passed since she's been there. The only things she has > going for her at this point are the endorsements of Tip O'Neal and the > National Organization for Women. She is certainly not qualified to be > vice-president nor even (heaven forbid) president. > > -- > Tom Albrecht Burroughs Corp. SDG/Devon They said the same sort of thing about Ronald Reagan when he ran for Governor of California with little more experience than as president of the Screen Actor's Guild. Which publically-elected national offices did George Bush hold before he became Vice President? Does this make him more qualified? Oh, yes, he *did* head the CIA for a while. No comment. -Ed Hall decvax!randvax!edhall