Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wlbr.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!wlbr!dcm From: dcm@wlbr.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion,net.women Subject: Re: Deific gender question Message-ID: <188@wlbr.UUCP> Date: Thu, 9-Aug-84 05:12:42 EDT Article-I.D.: wlbr.188 Posted: Thu Aug 9 05:12:42 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Aug-84 03:00:39 EDT References: <254@siemens.UUCP>, <957@pyuxn.UUCP> Organization: Eaton IMS, Westlake Village, CA Lines: 10 It seems to me that the question of the gender of deity is rather pointless. I use the masculine form when speaking of God, because that is what I am comfortable with. I really doubt that God is either male or female, God is God. In stating that God is male or female we are trying to define His existance in terms of our own mortal understanding. dave ..scgvaxd!wlbr!dcm