Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxb.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxb!alle From: alle@ihuxb.UUCP (Allen England) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: A Sketch of Arms Control Agreements Message-ID: <794@ihuxb.UUCP> Date: Wed, 8-Aug-84 22:30:30 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxb.794 Posted: Wed Aug 8 22:30:30 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 9-Aug-84 04:55:08 EDT References: <457@tty3b.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 31 > Antarctic Treaty (1959) > Hot Line Agreement (1963) > Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963) > Outer Space Treaty (1967) > Latin American Nuclear-Free Zone Treaty (1967) > Non-proliferation Treaty (1968) > Seabed Arms Control Treaty (1971) > Accidents Measures Agreement (1971) > Hot Line Modernization Agreement (1971) > Biological Weapons Convention (1972) > Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (1972) > SALT I Interim Agreement on Offensive Arms (1972) > Prevention of Nuclear War Agreement (1973) > Anti-Ballistic Missle Protocol (1974) > Threshold Test Ban Treaty (1974) > Vladivostok Aide-Memoire (1974) > Geneva Protocol (Ratified by U.S. 1975) > Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty (1976) > Environmental Modification Convention (1977) > SALT II Offensive Arms Treaty (1979) > Nuclear Material Convention (1980) > Mike Kelly Mike, if Reagan had added 10 new treaties to the *21* you cited, do you think you would feel any safer? With *21* of these treaties signed, we still have the largest number of nuclear (and otherwise) weapons on this Earth. Why do you think treaties are going to solve the problem? --> Allen <-- ihnp4!ihuxb!alle