Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site aecom.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd!decwrl!decvax!mcnc!philabs!aecom!naftoli
From: naftoli@aecom.UUCP (Robert Berlinger)
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.unix-wizards
Subject: newgrp(1) - inconsistent
Message-ID: <753@aecom.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 14:33:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: aecom.753
Posted: Tue Jul 24 14:33:19 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Jul-84 00:06:28 EDT
Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY
Lines: 9

Why were such pains taken to make the newgrp(1) command overlay
the current shell?  It seems to me that it's more natural to have it
fork off a seperate shell just like su(1) does.  In fact, I prefer
it that way.  Anyone else have any comments?
-- 
Robert Berlinger
...{philabs,cucard,pegasus,ihnp4,rocky2}!aecom!naftoli
"If you're not where you are, you're nowhere"