Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 6/7/83; site hao.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ward From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward) Newsgroups: net.kids Subject: Re: Parents' "rights"/responsibilities - reply to Mike Ward Message-ID: <1103@hao.UUCP> Date: Mon, 6-Aug-84 09:09:04 EDT Article-I.D.: hao.1103 Posted: Mon Aug 6 09:09:04 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 8-Aug-84 00:28:57 EDT References: <963@pyuxn.UUCP> Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 21 [] It sounds to me like the freedom of thought Rosen is talking about is the freedom to agree with Rosen. For disagreeing with Rosen, Charlie Mills is called subuseless (among other nasty things). For disagreeing with Rosen, I am called an asshole (privately). Rosen seems to have such a response to this issue because he is apparently none of the things he beleives a child should be raised to be(did I just write that?). The question is, if the parent is not to decide how best to raise a child, who will? The answer, obviously, is Rich Rosen. And that is why we must all insist that we, as parents, do have rights. Rich Rosen seems to be the type of person who fights his way to Washington to make the rules we all must suffer under. -- Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!sa!ward ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley BELL: 303-497-1252 USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307