Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-star!malik From: malik@star.DEC (Karl Malik ZK01-1/F22 1-1440) Newsgroups: net.music.classical Subject: what difference does it make? Message-ID: <2934@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Sun, 29-Jul-84 14:20:15 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.2934 Posted: Sun Jul 29 14:20:15 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 30-Jul-84 01:34:58 EDT Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Engineering Network Lines: 21 Subj; The never-ending argument I've made several attempts to throw some water on this heated (and silly) 'classical' vs. 'pop' argument. No one seems to address the points I've brought up. I'll try one more time - Thought experiment - Suppose I came up with the ultimate argument which showed that either 'classical' or 'pop' was superior in some way to the other. It left you speechless. After weeks of thinking about a rebuttal, you had to admit that my argument was valid. Would you then stop listening to the music you like/love? Is it it's superiority that you like? Striped of that, does it sound any different? The winner of this argument wins nothing. - Karl