Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site oliven.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!oliveb!olivee!oliven!hawk From: hawk@oliven.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles,net.motss Subject: Re: Miss America Message-ID: <313@oliven.UUCP> Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 22:29:20 EDT Article-I.D.: oliven.313 Posted: Tue Jul 24 22:29:20 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 20:47:12 EDT References: <3842@fortune.UUCP> Organization: Olivetti ATC, Cupertino, Ca Lines: 31 >I don't think the nude stuff bothered them a much as the fact that the scenes >involved another woman. 1: so what? 2: It being with another women does make it a more flagrant departure from the ideas they are trying to push/claim they hold. 3: I think they would have done it even if she had been by herself in the scenes. >She was a better role model than any of the past Miss America's, but of course >they won't even count that. Huh? The fact that she posed for the photos shows this to be false. I'd really like to see some support for your statement. While I'm at it, I'll throw my two cents worth in on the Hot dog incident as sexual harassment. Anybody who sincerely feels that it was her being a women that provoked the complaint has failed Greed 17b. It was the competition, and the traffic distraction bit was simply the best excuse he could come up with. If it was really an issue of she was too pretty, he would have kept his mouth shut and stared out the window at her. hawk -- (Rick Hawkins @ Olivetti ATC) {hplabs|zehntel|fortune|ios|tolerant|allegra|tymix}!oliveb!oliven!hawk