Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site teltone.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!teltone!mark From: mark@teltone.UUCP (Mark McWiggins) Newsgroups: net.followup,net.politics Subject: Re: alternate, hopefully safe, energy sources Message-ID: <670@teltone.UUCP> Date: Fri, 3-Aug-84 16:10:43 EDT Article-I.D.: teltone.670 Posted: Fri Aug 3 16:10:43 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 5-Aug-84 00:12:38 EDT References: <798@ihuxx.UUCP>, <9368@gatech.UUCP> Organization: Teltone Corp., Kirkland, WA Lines: 14 <> > The "best" new power source that should be developed is Fusion Energy. > Fusion should be able to supply all the "high-grade" energy needed for > heavy industry, and at the same time be "clean". I.e. fusion power > doesn't leave lots of nuclear waste materials lying around. Except for the fact that producing a practical fusion reactor is arguably the most difficult engineering feat ever attempted. Remember when FISSION was going to be "too cheap to meter"? Fusion is a lot tougher! -- ....tektronix!uw-beaver!teltone!mark