Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site qubix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!akgua!whuxle!harpo!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!qubix!steven
From: steven@qubix.UUCP (Steven Maurer)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Homosexual teachers- a serious question
Message-ID: <1286@qubix.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Jul-84 16:57:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: qubix.1286
Posted: Mon Jul 23 16:57:26 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Jul-84 00:43:21 EDT
References: <2014@hplabsc.UUCP> <848@pucc-h>, <1276@qubix.UUCP>
Organization: Qubix Graphic Systems, Saratoga, CA
Lines: 39

[+]

>  > The founding fathers didn't believe in majority rule, at least not
>  > in its purest sense.  They put many restrictions on our democracy,
>  > in order to avoid a "tyranny of the majority."  After all, how can
>  > a right be "inalienable" if it's subject to majority opinion?
>  
>  And who is man to determine "inalienable rights" that are "endowed by
>  their Creator"? Don't separate rights from their source.
>  BTW, the majority can remove a Congressman or a school board member...

	Larry, you are quoting the Declaration of Independence, which
    is no law of the US government.   While the sentiments that are
    revealed in that document are important, they (especially the
    *religious* portions) are just an opinion.   Please do not confuse
    the religion of our founding fathers, with the logic which led them
    to create the government they did.   Amazingly enough, *they* were
    wise enough to see that attributing a government to a god, is the
    easiest way to encourage tyranny.

	I also fail to see why you insist on protheletizing (sp?) in
    a group as far away from the subject as net.singles.  Please keep
    these type of articles in net.relegion where they belong.

>                        ....... the particular views of an art teacher, or
>  the political views of a history teacher - private views DO influence the
>  way a subject is taught and the values implicit in the teaching.  The
>  attitudes that affect the private life also affect the public one.

	Homosexuality is something imprinted near birth (first year).
	This has been proven through scientific inquiry, and luckily
	the bible does not say anything about the matter -- so you
	are free to look the evidence without predjudice.   There is
	*no way* that a Homosexual teacher is going to encourage a
	change in the innate sexuality of a student.

    Steven Maurer