Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site opus.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!cires!nbires!opus!rcd From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: religion and public life: texas Message-ID: <658@opus.UUCP> Date: Tue, 31-Jul-84 21:17:49 EDT Article-I.D.: opus.658 Posted: Tue Jul 31 21:17:49 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 3-Aug-84 23:55:52 EDT References: <927@ulysses.UUCP> <367@oliven.UUCP> Organization: NBI, Boulder Lines: 10 >The requirement to profess belief in a Supreme Being could indeed be >Constitutional, iff the manner in which this expression is made is left to the >individual. This would not grant recognition to or constitute establishment of >a religion... Could someone please explain how "belief in a Supreme Being" is not a religious issue? -- Dick Dunn {hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd (303)444-5710 x3086 ...Keep your day job 'til your night job pays.