Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!cbosgd!cbscc!pmd From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: A Time for Anger Message-ID: <3456@cbscc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 17-Aug-84 11:59:40 EDT Article-I.D.: cbscc.3456 Posted: Fri Aug 17 11:59:40 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 19-Aug-84 02:30:00 EDT References: <122@bsdgvax.UUCP> <1131@ihuxq.UUCP>, <840@ut-ngp.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 25 >Ken Perlow has hit the fundamental issue: whether someone who does not >participate in a situation has the right to interfere. Men do not get >pregnant; thus they should not make rules about pregnancy. Men cannot >fault womens' decisions about an experience men can never have. If >some man does not like the possibility that a woman may choose to abort >his unborn child, he shouldn't allow any possibility of conception. > >Ken "Smurf-shredder" Montgomery >...{ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm So what do you guys say to women pro-lifers? I think I can safely say that the great majority of them are women. Anyway I don't think your objections hold up. Were those who were in line for the draft the only ones who had the right to oppose (or support) it? Can't someone be opposed to something on principle? Who else is there to speak for the rights of those in line to be aborted? A good many of them are (very young) women too. -- Paul Dubuc {cbosgd,ihnp4}!cbscc!pmd The true light that enlightens every one was coming into the world... (John 1:9)