Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site opus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!cires!nbires!opus!rcd
From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: religion and public life: texas
Message-ID: <658@opus.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 31-Jul-84 21:17:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: opus.658
Posted: Tue Jul 31 21:17:49 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Aug-84 23:55:52 EDT
References: <927@ulysses.UUCP> <367@oliven.UUCP>
Organization: NBI, Boulder
Lines: 10

>The requirement to profess belief in a Supreme Being could indeed be
>Constitutional, iff the manner in which this expression is made is left to the
>individual.  This would not grant recognition to or constitute establishment of
>a religion...

Could someone please explain how "belief in a Supreme Being" is not a
religious issue?
-- 
Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086
	...Keep your day job 'til your night job pays.