Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!cbosgd!cbscc!pmd
From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: A Time for Anger
Message-ID: <3456@cbscc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-Aug-84 11:59:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbscc.3456
Posted: Fri Aug 17 11:59:40 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 19-Aug-84 02:30:00 EDT
References: <122@bsdgvax.UUCP> <1131@ihuxq.UUCP>, <840@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus
Lines: 25


>Ken Perlow has hit the fundamental issue: whether someone who does not
>participate in a situation has the right to interfere.  Men do not get
>pregnant; thus they should not make rules about pregnancy.  Men cannot
>fault womens' decisions about an experience men can never have.  If
>some man does not like the possibility that a woman may choose to abort
>his unborn child, he shouldn't allow any possibility of conception.
>
    >Ken "Smurf-shredder" Montgomery
    >...{ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm

So what do you guys say to women pro-lifers?  I think I can safely
say that the great majority of them are women.  Anyway I don't think
your objections hold up.  Were those who were in line for the draft
the only ones who had the right to oppose (or support) it?  Can't someone
be opposed to something on principle?  Who else is there to speak for
the rights of those in line to be aborted?  A good many of them
are (very young) women too.

-- 

Paul Dubuc 		{cbosgd,ihnp4}!cbscc!pmd

  The true light that enlightens every one was coming
  into the world...		(John 1:9)