Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site randvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@randvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Foreget Reagan, Forget Mondale, Forget Hart
Message-ID: <1856@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Jul-84 18:55:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: randvax.1856
Posted: Thu Jul 26 18:55:23 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 21:05:37 EDT
References: <1072@hao.UUCP> <894@pyuxa.UUCP> <214@fisher.UUCP>, <116@bsdgvax.UUCP>
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 23

>    ....  The question is:  Is the person qualified for the job?  We're
> talking about a 3-term congresswoman who hasn't had a piece of her
> legislation passed since she's been there.  The only things she has
> going for her at this point are the endorsements of Tip O'Neal and the
> National Organization for Women.  She is certainly not qualified to be
> vice-president nor even (heaven forbid) president.
>
> --
>                 Tom Albrecht            Burroughs Corp.
					SDG/Devon

They said the same sort of thing about Ronald Reagan when he ran for
Governor of California with little more experience than as president
of the Screen Actor's Guild.

Which publically-elected national offices did George Bush hold before
he became Vice President?  Does this make him more qualified?  Oh, yes,
he *did* head the CIA for a while.

No comment.

		-Ed Hall
		decvax!randvax!edhall