Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sdccs6.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdccs6!ix21 From: ix21@sdccs6.UUCP Newsgroups: net.religion,net.politics,net.legal Subject: Re: religion and public life: texas Message-ID: <1672@sdccs6.UUCP> Date: Wed, 1-Aug-84 23:03:53 EDT Article-I.D.: sdccs6.1672 Posted: Wed Aug 1 23:03:53 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Aug-84 03:30:11 EDT References: <927@ulysses.UUCP> Organization: UCSD Medical School Lines: 9 Several articles have been debating whether a religious test for holding a public office is consitutional. Many people have stated that such a test violates the 1st admendent. That has nothing to do with the debate. Article six of the consitution specifically states that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office of the United States or any of its compoment states. What can be more clearer?