Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekecs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!jeffw
From: jeffw@tekecs.UUCP (Jeff Winslow)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Women's body parts - clarification
Message-ID: <3986@tekecs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-Aug-84 19:34:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekecs.3986
Posted: Mon Aug 20 19:34:53 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 22-Aug-84 01:17:37 EDT
References: <3971@tekecs.UUCP>, <1849@stolaf.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 8

Tom:
   It was asserted that *the* reason certain pictures were degrading is
that they showed only parts of women's bodies. Period. The point of the
counterexample was to show this was not always true, since it is highly
unlikely the photographer was promoting such things. Therefore, if the
counterexample is to be taken seriously, the original assertion is false.

					Jeff Winslow