Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hound!rfg From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: hound!rfg's comments on TSS - endorsement Message-ID: <588@hound.UUCP> Date: Wed, 22-Aug-84 10:57:58 EDT Article-I.D.: hound.588 Posted: Wed Aug 22 10:57:58 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Aug-84 00:47:08 EDT References: <185@whuxl.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 21 [] I heartily endorse Bill Mitchell's comments on my comments about T$S. I think there is room for both messages within the larger hall of "truth." Perhaps the art has advanced to the point where we have to use language like " left center stage in the upper midrange" (to invent a term thathave been used bt T$S. My purpose was to indicate that there are limitations to T$S - don't expect too much. I did and I was grossly dissapointed by the two issues I got back by return mail. On the CD issue, if we waited until the art was "mature", T$S, if it existed at all, would be writing about the latest from Victor Talking Machines and commenting on the new radical design of the conical horns. What I think I see is a commercial decision to direct most of the world to CD or other digital technology, while a push is made to hang on with "Up-scale analog". Imagine, Stereo Review going go-go while pushing Linn-Sondek turntables. Boggled mind my is. Dick Grantges hound!rfg