Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bmcg.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!bmcg!bprice From: bprice@bmcg.UUCP Newsgroups: net.consumers,net.politics Subject: Re: Re: ID Message-ID: <1260@bmcg.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Aug-84 14:20:07 EDT Article-I.D.: bmcg.1260 Posted: Mon Aug 20 14:20:07 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Aug-84 03:42:04 EDT References: <151@whuxl.UUCP>, <1593@ucbvax.UUCP>, <466@tty3b.UUCP> Organization: Burroughs Corporation, San Diego Lines: 16 Over the weeks that this conversation has been going on, I have yet to see anyone point out that, right here in the good old U S of A, the Supreme Court of the land has held it to be proper use of the police power of the State, to 'detain' anyone who does not produce sufficient identification, at the demand of a 'peace officer.' Not only that, but I'm old enough to remember what my draft card said on it--that it must be kept on my person, and shown, on demand, to duly constituted authorities, like the government policeman. The moral--don't be fooled by all the statist propaganda you hear. The USA is not as free as we know it should be. -- --Bill Price uucp: {decvax!ucbvax philabs}!sdcsvax!bmcg!bprice arpa:? sdcsvax!bmcg!bprice@nosc