Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site uwmacc.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois From: dubois@uwmacc.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Redbook Message-ID: <184@uwmacc.UUCP> Date: Wed, 1-Aug-84 12:58:12 EDT Article-I.D.: uwmacc.184 Posted: Wed Aug 1 12:58:12 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 3-Aug-84 02:30:55 EDT References: <894@pucc-h> Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center Lines: 31 Tsk tsk, Rsk: You can swear all you want at Jeff, and so advertise to the rest of us by your filthy language the lack of care you take in crafting your postings to the net, but... You still have not said why I was wrong. You have not demonstrated what it was about my posting that so aroused your ire. I had concluded that Christian women enjoy sex. You said, I believe, that the link between the results of the Redbook study and my conclusion was, um, well...you said something "inhospitable", shall we say. I replied with a request for elucidation of the fallacy in my logic. Jeff defended my conclusion. You expressed some "minor irritation" with him, stating as well that: I think if you apply a miniscule portion of logic to the problem, that this will become apparent to you. However, we all know (especially my friends in motss!) that I'M A REAL DOPE!! And I have to have things explained to me. So, PLEASE, would you edify me on my logic and what's wrong with it? -- Paul DuBois {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois And he is before all things, and by him all things consist... Colossians 1:17