Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!ka
From: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Libertarian position on certain 'law
Message-ID: <756@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Aug-84 13:54:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou3c.756
Posted: Thu Aug 16 13:54:51 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Aug-84 01:16:43 EDT
References: <1701@inmet.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 15

> >All that discussion of suing suggests one more question for libertarians.
> >Should motorists be legally required to purchase liability insurance?
>
> Clearly a question for the owners of roads that the drivers wish to drive
> on.
>				Nat Howard

I'm not sure we understand each other.  Somebody smashes their car into me,
I win a lawsuit against them but the person does not have enough money to
pay the judgement.  Currently, most states attempt to protect me in this
situation by requiring the the person to carry insurance.  The question I
was trying to get at is what protection I would have in a libertarian so-
ciety.  I don't see why the owner of the road would be involved in the case
at all.
				Kenneth Almquist