Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site allegra.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!root From: root@allegra.UUCP (Allegra Staff) Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Forwarded Message Message-ID: <2668@allegra.UUCP> Date: Sun, 5-Aug-84 03:05:08 EDT Article-I.D.: allegra.2668 Posted: Sun Aug 5 03:05:08 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 5-Aug-84 06:42:58 EDT Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill Lines: 16 I agree with Tannenbaum: Ken Arndt is a very naughty boy, but finking on him is not cool. Let's face it, there are a lot of naughty boys on net.motss! So what is all this BS about "invert" versus "pervert". I don't care if being gay is learned or inborn. I don't care if 75 percent of the population never does it. I don't care if the Bible says it is bad. I don't even care if Ken Arndt says it is bad. If two motss want to have sex, who are they hurting? And if they do hurt each other, isn't straight sex just as "dangerous"? And what business is it of anyone else's? If you want to peek through keyholes, why don't you get angry at the child molesters and wife beaters. Hell hath no fury like... "Lance"