Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP Path: utzoo!dciem!jeff From: jeff@dciem.UUCP (Jeff Richardson) Newsgroups: can.politics Subject: Re: The non-interference society; judgement in haste? Message-ID: <1064@dciem.UUCP> Date: Tue, 21-Aug-84 16:25:27 EDT Article-I.D.: dciem.1064 Posted: Tue Aug 21 16:25:27 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 21-Aug-84 18:53:44 EDT References: <999@hcrvax.UUCP>, <8680@watmath.UUCP>, <4226@utzoo.UUCP>, <8700@watmath.UUCP>, <8712@watmath.UUCP> Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada Lines: 13 The "traditional" (as Ian! calls it) system of having governments make decisions for us for the benefit of society makes sense, but only when it is necessary to do so. The problem is that Canada's governments have been making far too many decisions for us unneccessarily, and many of them are of questionable benefit to society. I know you're going to ask me how to determine when it's necessary for the government to make a decision for us, and I agree that it's not always easy, but the line has to be drawn somewhere and I think it should have been drawn a long time ago. By the way, I don't expect the situation to get any better, regardless of who is elected. -- Jeff Richardson, DCIEM, Toronto (416) 635-2073 {linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd}!utcsrgv!dciem!jeff {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!dciem!jeff