Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 6/7/83; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP (Mike Ward)
Newsgroups: net.kids
Subject: Re: Parents' "rights"/responsibilities - reply to Mike Ward
Message-ID: <1103@hao.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Aug-84 09:09:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: hao.1103
Posted: Mon Aug  6 09:09:04 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Aug-84 00:28:57 EDT
References: <963@pyuxn.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 21

[]
It sounds to me like the freedom of thought Rosen is talking about is the
freedom to agree with Rosen.  For disagreeing with Rosen, Charlie Mills
is called subuseless (among other nasty things).  For disagreeing with
Rosen, I am called an asshole (privately).  Rosen seems to have such a
response to this issue because he is apparently none of the things he 
beleives a child should be raised to be(did I just write that?).

The question is, if the parent is not to decide how best to raise a child,
who will?  The answer, obviously, is Rich Rosen.

And that is why we must all insist that we, as parents, do have rights.
Rich Rosen seems to be the type of person who fights his way to Washington
to make the rules we all must suffer under.

-- 
Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD
UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!sa!ward
ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley
BELL: 303-497-1252
USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO  80307