Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site uwmacc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois
From: dubois@uwmacc.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Redbook
Message-ID: <184@uwmacc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 1-Aug-84 12:58:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: uwmacc.184
Posted: Wed Aug  1 12:58:12 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Aug-84 02:30:55 EDT
References: <894@pucc-h>
Organization: UWisconsin-Madison Academic Comp Center
Lines: 31


Tsk tsk, Rsk:

You can swear all you want at Jeff, and so advertise to the rest
of us by your filthy language the lack of care you take in
crafting your postings to the net, but...

You still have not said why I was wrong.

You have not demonstrated what it was about my posting that so
aroused your ire.  I had concluded that Christian women enjoy
sex.  You said, I believe, that the link between the results
of the Redbook study and my conclusion was, um, well...you
said something "inhospitable", shall we say.  I replied with
a request for elucidation of the fallacy in my logic.  Jeff
defended my conclusion.  You expressed some "minor irritation"
with him, stating as well that:

	I think if you apply a miniscule portion of logic to the problem,
	that this will become apparent to you.

However, we all know (especially my friends in motss!) that
I'M A REAL DOPE!!  And I have to have things explained to me.
So, PLEASE, would you edify me on my logic and what's wrong with
it?
-- 

Paul DuBois		{allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!dubois

And he is before all things, and by him all things consist...
						Colossians 1:17