Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wlbr.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!wlbr!dcm
From: dcm@wlbr.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.women
Subject: Re: Deific gender question
Message-ID: <188@wlbr.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Aug-84 05:12:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: wlbr.188
Posted: Thu Aug  9 05:12:42 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Aug-84 03:00:39 EDT
References: <254@siemens.UUCP>, <957@pyuxn.UUCP>
Organization: Eaton IMS, Westlake Village, CA
Lines: 10

It seems to me that the question of the gender of
deity is rather pointless.  I use the masculine form
when speaking of God, because that is what I am
comfortable with.  I really doubt that God is either
male or female, God is God.  In stating that God
is male or female we are trying to define His
existance in terms of our own mortal understanding.

			dave
			..scgvaxd!wlbr!dcm