Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 6/7/83; site hao.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!bmcg!cepu!hao!ward
From: ward@hao.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Awaiting scientific creationism (still)
Message-ID: <1096@hao.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 2-Aug-84 14:14:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: hao.1096
Posted: Thu Aug  2 14:14:10 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Aug-84 05:22:55 EDT
References: <654@opus.UUCP>
Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 18

[]
	[Stated yet
	another way, I'm interested in evaluating creationism, not weighing
	it against evolutionism.  After all, they might both be wrong:-]

No, Dick, you just don't understand.  Evolution might be wrong.  It, after
all is science.  Scientific Creationism *MUST* be right.  It has the same
relationship to science as a Democratic People's Republic has to democracy.
(or republicacy (or whatever)).

Need I put in the :-) ?..........probably

-- 
Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD
UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!sa!ward
ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley
BELL: 303-497-1252
USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO  80307