Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fisher.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!fisher!david
From: david@fisher.UUCP (David Rubin)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Libertarianism Query - (nf)
Message-ID: <265@fisher.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 11-Aug-84 11:01:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: fisher.265
Posted: Sat Aug 11 11:01:22 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 12-Aug-84 01:16:24 EDT
References: <130@zinfande.UUCP> <10100076@ea.UUCP>
Organization: Princeton Univ. Statistics
Lines: 15

Sincere question:

If Libertarianism relies so heavily upon litigation for individuals to
guard their well-being, does that mean one can infringe the rights of
those without the resources to initiate a law suit? Are the poor
unable to avail themselves of litigation?

Second sincere question:

If someone does not have sufficient resources to pay a judgment
against themselves, what recourse does the offended party have? Are
poor people therefore immune to litigation?

					David Rubin
			{allegra|astrovax|princeton}!fisher!david