Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: A Time for Anger Message-ID: <840@ut-ngp.UUCP> Date: Tue, 14-Aug-84 17:51:20 EDT Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.840 Posted: Tue Aug 14 17:51:20 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Aug-84 00:18:03 EDT References: <122@bsdgvax.UUCP> <1131@ihuxq.UUCP> Organization: Comp. Center, Univ. of Texas at Austin Lines: 31 [ "Just eat it..." -Wierd Al ] >> The fact is you only want freedom for the woman. What about the unborn >> child? Someone must protect the rights of the unborn. Self-serving >> feminists want us to believe that a woman has a right to an abortion. >> BUNK! The abortionist wants to make the decision for the unborn. >> >> ... >> >> I say it's time to stop all the talk and do something. Picket abortion >> institutes. Sit-in and demonstrate, peacefully... >> >> Tom Albrecht Burroughs Corp. Thus it was for us early Vietnam War protesters, back when American involvement in SE Asia was popular. So Tom, I understand your righteous anger. You must see Roe vs. Wade the way I saw the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. There is one big difference, of course: I was about to be drafted. You, sir, will never be pregnant. ken perlow Ken Perlow has hit the fundamental issue: whether someone who does not participate in a situation has the right to interfere. Men do not get pregnant; thus they should not make rules about pregnancy. Men cannot fault womens' decisions about an experience men can never have. If some man does not like the possibility that a woman may choose to abort his unborn child, he shouldn't allow any possibility of conception. Ken "Smurf-shredder" Montgomery ...{ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm