Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hound!rfg
From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: hound!rfg's comments on TSS - endorsement
Message-ID: <588@hound.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 22-Aug-84 10:57:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: hound.588
Posted: Wed Aug 22 10:57:58 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Aug-84 00:47:08 EDT
References: <185@whuxl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 21

[]
I heartily endorse Bill Mitchell's comments on my comments about
T$S.  I think there is room for both messages within the larger
hall of "truth." Perhaps the art has advanced to the point where
we have to use language like " left center stage in the upper
midrange" (to invent a term that  have been used bt T$S.

My purpose was to indicate that there are limitations to T$S - don't
expect too much.  I did and I was grossly dissapointed by the two
issues I got back by return mail.

On the CD issue, if we waited until the art was "mature", T$S,
if it existed at all, would be writing about the latest from
Victor Talking Machines and commenting on the new radical
design of the conical horns.
What I think I see is a commercial decision to direct most of the
world to CD or other digital technology, while a push is made to
hang on with "Up-scale analog". Imagine, Stereo Review going
go-go while pushing Linn-Sondek turntables. Boggled mind my is.
Dick Grantges hound!rfg