Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Down on the farm - (nf)
Message-ID: <10100079@ea.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Aug-84 04:40:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.10100079
Posted: Thu Aug  9 04:40:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Aug-84 06:53:47 EDT
References: <238@siemens.UUCP>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:siemens:-23800:ea:10100079:000:521
Nf-From: ea!mwm    Aug  9 03:40:00 1984

#R:siemens:-23800:ea:10100079:000:521
ea!mwm    Aug  9 03:40:00 1984

/***** ea:net.politics / kel /  4:46 pm  Aug  8, 1984 */
This is (according to Ken Meier, a
South Dakota agri-businessman's son become political
scientist at the University of Oklahoma) a result of a
myth held within the bureaucracy that bigger farms are
more efficient farms.
/* ---------- */

Rather than just slinging around suggestive phrases (or
playing net.politics as usual), how about some facts that
demonstrate the falsity of this intuitively correct "myth"?
Or do they exist only in the twilight zone?