Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!abh
From: abh@ccivax.UUCP (Andrew X. Hudson)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Chuq & Feeelthy Peectures
Message-ID: <188@ccivax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Aug-84 14:01:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccivax.188
Posted: Mon Aug  6 14:01:42 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Aug-84 00:42:14 EDT
References: <1252@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Telephony Systems Group,  Roch, NY
Lines: 24

I really can't see your point of view on this one. I for one read
Penthouse. For the Forum not for some inane, useless column like
Playboy Adviser. I find the other fiction quite scintilllating.

I mean really, what the hell purpose does it serve reading dirty
magazines and skipping over all the parts you pay for. 

And if softcore or subliminal core is your bag why don't you try
Cosmopolitan, Vogue, 17, and Good Housekeeping. You'd be surprised
at the columns they run. The pictures they run in the adverts, though
considered 'safe' for housewives and young impressionable adolescents
would certainly raise the eyebrow  of any southern bible belting porno
sniffer. 

Of course you can always let your fingers peruse the pages of the Sear's
catalog underwear section.

					Andrew Hudson
				Presidential Advisor on Pornography
-- 
"Freedom of choice is what you got
 Freedom from choice is what you want"
			 - DEVO
	...[rlgvax | decvax | ucbvax!allegra]!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!abh