Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site loral.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdccs6!loral!simard From: simard@loral.UUCP (Dramis Yar) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Defense cuts - RSVP Message-ID: <416@loral.UUCP> Date: Tue, 14-Aug-84 12:52:02 EDT Article-I.D.: loral.416 Posted: Tue Aug 14 12:52:02 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 16-Aug-84 07:10:54 EDT Organization: Loral Instrumentation, San Diego, CA Lines: 49 [Repondez, s'il-vous-plait] I've been hearing (like everyone) calls to reduce the federal deficit by cutting the defense budget. If you agree, I'd like to hear (well, read) specifically what you'd like to see cut from defense, to be tabulated and summarized to this newsgroup. All I ask is the following: 1. For this discussion, orient choices from an economic viewpoint. While there is plenty of room for discussion of which military projects are more valuable militarily, this time, these should be deficit-cutting approaches. 2. Be as general or specific as you like, however, if possible mention specific areas of military spending, e.g. a certain procurement program, weapons system, etc. 3. IMPORTANT: Unless requested by the author, responses may be excerpted and included in future postings to the net. If you want your response to be totally private, please indicate so. 4. Include (if you wish) some personal data: age, political party if any, if you consider yourself conservative, liberal, or whatever, who you would vote for for president if the election were held today, anything else you find you'd like to include. 5. Remember, the idea is to support or refute the idea that significant reduction of our $170+ billion deficit can be made by cutting defense spending. To be most useful, your suggestions should add up to a major amount in relation to this figure. ------- Respond by e-mail and when time or response level is appropriate, I will summarize the results. The tablulation of responses will be strictly by the numbers; any personal editorializing on my part will be separately posted. Note: only mailed responses will be tabulated. Reminder: responses may be exceerpted and posted unless otherwise requested by the respondent. Thanks in advance for participating! -- [ I am not a stranger, but a friend you haven't met yet ] Ray Simard Loral Instrumentation, San Diego {ucbvax, ittvax!dcdwest}!sdcsvax!sdccsu3!loral!simard