Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert
From: seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Novel? idea on drinking and driving?
Message-ID: <1285@ihuxl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Aug-84 09:19:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxl.1285
Posted: Thu Aug  9 09:19:13 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 10-Aug-84 01:09:13 EDT
References: <2175@ihnss.UUCP> <1083@hou4b.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 18

I think the drinking license is probably a good idea (although
I hate to see yet more govt interferrence) and is certainly a
better idea than roadblocks, taking away drivers licenses, etc.

I must object to a mandatory getting-drunk session, though.
My body gets enough abuse without the govt insisting on my
getting drunk.  Not to mention the Biblical warnings about
drunkeness.

Have this experience *available* to those who want it, but don't
make it mandatory for those who have enough intelligence to
know not to get drunk (with or without driving).
-- 
	_____
       /_____\	how in blue blazes do they expect a EE to cook on a gas stove?
      /_______\	
	|___|			    Snoopy
    ____|___|_____	       ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert