Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:afo
From: afo@pucc-k (sefton)
Newsgroups: net.comics
Subject: Reply on Dr. Who Comic
Message-ID: <248@pucc-k>
Date: Sat, 28-Jul-84 16:20:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: pucc-k.248
Posted: Sat Jul 28 16:20:18 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Jul-84 23:58:52 EDT
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Lines: 29
And now for something completely different:
1. Yes, I know that Marvel is repeating the Dr. Who comics from their
weekly (now monthly) in the U.K.
2. I am quite aware that the Tom Baker persona of the Doctor is probably
the favourite of North Amerian fandom.
<>
<>
However;
If I am going to pay $1.50 for this mag, I want to see something for it!!
I think it was the combination of the lateness of the magazine, the re-hash
from the old Premiere, and the #$%&'%()0("# Dalek story in the back.
If they had to wait 6 months after they announce the appearance of this
magazine, I want to see some new material! I feel as if Marvel is going
for some really hard-core fan abusing in this. They can print 6 year old
strips, and make a large amount of money on it. I realise that they aren't
in the business out of the goodness of their hearts, but they seem to be
inreasingly crossing over the line of sheer abuse.
<>
Laurie
pucc-k:afo