Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP (Ken Montgomery)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: A Time for Anger
Message-ID: <840@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 14-Aug-84 17:51:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.840
Posted: Tue Aug 14 17:51:20 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Aug-84 00:18:03 EDT
References: <122@bsdgvax.UUCP> <1131@ihuxq.UUCP>
Organization: Comp. Center, Univ. of Texas at Austin
Lines: 31

[ "Just eat it..." -Wierd Al ]

   >> The fact is you only want freedom for the woman.  What about the unborn
   >> child?  Someone must protect the rights of the unborn.  Self-serving
   >> feminists want us to believe that a woman has a right to an abortion.
   >> BUNK!  The abortionist wants to make the decision for the unborn.
   >>
   >> ...
   >>
   >> I say it's time to stop all the talk and do something.  Picket abortion
   >> institutes.  Sit-in and demonstrate, peacefully...
   >>
   >>          Tom Albrecht                Burroughs Corp.

   Thus it was for us early Vietnam War protesters, back when American
   involvement in SE Asia was popular.  So Tom, I understand your righteous
   anger.  You must see Roe vs. Wade the way I saw the Gulf of Tonkin
   Resolution.  There is one big difference, of course: I was about to be
   drafted.  You, sir, will never be pregnant.

        ken perlow

Ken Perlow has hit the fundamental issue: whether someone who does not
participate in a situation has the right to interfere.  Men do not get
pregnant; thus they should not make rules about pregnancy.  Men cannot
fault womens' decisions about an experience men can never have.  If
some man does not like the possibility that a woman may choose to abort
his unborn child, he shouldn't allow any possibility of conception.

    Ken "Smurf-shredder" Montgomery
    ...{ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm