Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site shark.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!shark!hutch From: hutch@shark.UUCP Newsgroups: net.consumers Subject: Re: Washers and Dryers Message-ID: <980@shark.UUCP> Date: Mon, 13-Aug-84 14:44:19 EDT Article-I.D.: shark.980 Posted: Mon Aug 13 14:44:19 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 15-Aug-84 00:36:17 EDT References: <1220@vax2.fluke.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR Lines: 33 < are YOU puzzled by dingy whites and drab colors? > | I feel that Consumers Reports is biased too far towards reliablility | and not enough toward features and practicality particularly with | regard to their recommendation of Maytag. My folks bought a Maytag | about 5 years ago, and even though it has been very reliable, I have | been unimpressed. It has a very short wash cycle, poor agitation, and | few water level, temperature, and cycle options. This was the top | rated washer by Consumers Reports in that year. | | Craig V. Johnson Last time I read a Consumer Reports study of washers, it took into account not only reliability but several other factors including features and practicality. They studied how well the washers worked on "standard" dirt using a range of detergents and cleaners, in hard and soft water, using hot and cold, and so on. They included electrical consumption. They included little things like "how easily can I lose socks in this machine". They included how well the washer "mixed" clothes, in other words whether and how often clothes moved from next to the agitator to outside and from top to bottom. I think I recall that they commented that Maytag had some differences in its cycle, but that the clothes came out acceptably clean. They seem to scoff at unnecessary complications; they might have found the number of temp, level, and cycle options sufficient for average use. I primarily use CR as an indicator of what to avoid rather than what is necessarily the "best" buy. Hutch