Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-star!malik
From: malik@star.DEC (Karl Malik ZK01-1/F22 1-1440)
Newsgroups: net.music.classical
Subject: what difference does it make?
Message-ID: <2934@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Jul-84 14:20:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.2934
Posted: Sun Jul 29 14:20:15 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Jul-84 01:34:58 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Engineering Network
Lines: 21

Subj; The never-ending argument


	I've made several attempts to throw some water on this heated
(and silly) 'classical' vs. 'pop' argument. No one seems to address
the points I've brought up.

	I'll try one more time -

	Thought experiment - Suppose I came up with the ultimate argument
which showed that either 'classical' or 'pop' was superior in some way
to the other. It left you speechless. After weeks of thinking about a
rebuttal, you had to admit that my argument was valid.

	Would you then stop listening to the music you like/love? Is
it it's superiority that you like? Striped of that, does it sound
any different?

	The winner of this argument wins nothing.

							- Karl