Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.14 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!stank From: stank@uiucdcs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: electric-shock therapy to treat sex- - (nf) Message-ID: <31600081@uiucdcs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 10-Aug-84 16:48:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.31600081 Posted: Fri Aug 10 16:48:00 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Aug-84 06:56:47 EDT References: <3158@decwrl.UUCP> Lines: 26 Nf-ID: #R:decwrl:-315800:uiucdcs:31600081:000:1136 Nf-From: uiucdcs!stank Aug 10 15:48:00 1984 #R:decwrl:-315800:uiucdcs:31600081:000:1136 uiucdcs!stank Aug 10 15:48:00 1984 <> Given that scores of the males (mails!?) degraded when errors either were verbally reported or when shock was administered, are we allowed to conclude that men tend to fall apart when things start going badly? I know I do -- if I make several mistakes when doing something, I tend to get frustrated and then really screw up. A point about the reliability of this study. Even given that 33 males and 33 females is a sufficient number of test subjects (which I doubt), it should be pointed out that virtually all of these students will be from not only a single region of the country but from a single state (viz., Kansas). Furthermore, they all had the same major, i.e., pe. Now, I've got nothing against Kansas (I enjoyed going to school at K.U.) and nothing against pe majors, but aren't the subjects of this test from too similar backgrounds to make any real generalizations? Oh well, I don't know much about real science-- I'm in computer science. Stanley Krolikoski University of Illinois ..!pur-ee!uiucdcs!stank