Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Meat markets - (nf)
Message-ID: <3300046@ea.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Jul-84 14:54:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.3300046
Posted: Thu Jul 26 14:54:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Jul-84 23:54:43 EDT
References: <1471@unc-c.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:unc-c:-147100:ea:3300046:000:684
Nf-From: ea!mwm    Jul 26 13:54:00 1984

#R:unc-c:-147100:ea:3300046:000:684
ea!mwm    Jul 26 13:54:00 1984

/***** ea:net.flame / unc-c!dya /  8:18 pm  Jul 24, 1984 */
It is truly disgusting to evaluate people on how well their breasts fill
out a swimsuit, or whatever the "criteria" are.  Aren't we above this yet?

-dya-
/* ---------- */

Whether it is disgusting to evaluate somebody based on such criteria
depends on what you are evaluating them *for*. That kind of evaluation for
a job as, say programmer, borders on the criminally irresponsible.  For
other positions, though, it makes perfect sense. (-: Sorry, I just couldn't
resist. Maybe this should have gone to net.singles? :-)

Whether such displays should take place on national television is another
questions entirely.