Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxb!alle
From: alle@ihuxb.UUCP (Allen England)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: A Sketch of Arms Control Agreements
Message-ID: <794@ihuxb.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Aug-84 22:30:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxb.794
Posted: Wed Aug  8 22:30:30 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Aug-84 04:55:08 EDT
References: <457@tty3b.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 31


  > Antarctic Treaty (1959)
  > Hot Line Agreement (1963)
  > Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963)
  > Outer Space Treaty (1967)
  > Latin American Nuclear-Free Zone Treaty (1967)
  > Non-proliferation Treaty (1968)
  > Seabed Arms Control Treaty (1971)
  > Accidents Measures Agreement (1971)
  > Hot Line Modernization Agreement (1971)
  > Biological Weapons Convention (1972)
  > Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (1972)
  > SALT I Interim Agreement on Offensive Arms (1972)
  > Prevention of Nuclear War Agreement (1973)
  > Anti-Ballistic Missle Protocol (1974)
  > Threshold Test Ban Treaty (1974)
  > Vladivostok Aide-Memoire (1974)
  > Geneva Protocol (Ratified by U.S. 1975)
  > Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty (1976)
  > Environmental Modification Convention (1977)
  > SALT II Offensive Arms Treaty (1979)
  > Nuclear Material Convention (1980)
  > Mike Kelly

Mike, if Reagan had added 10 new treaties to the *21* you cited, do you
think you would feel any safer?  With *21* of these treaties signed, we
still have the largest number of nuclear (and otherwise) weapons on this
Earth.  Why do you think treaties are going to solve the problem?

--> Allen <--
ihnp4!ihuxb!alle