Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ea!mwm From: mwm@ea.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Meat markets - (nf) Message-ID: <3300046@ea.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Jul-84 14:54:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ea.3300046 Posted: Thu Jul 26 14:54:00 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Jul-84 23:54:43 EDT References: <1471@unc-c.UUCP> Lines: 20 Nf-ID: #R:unc-c:-147100:ea:3300046:000:684 Nf-From: ea!mwm Jul 26 13:54:00 1984 #R:unc-c:-147100:ea:3300046:000:684 ea!mwm Jul 26 13:54:00 1984 /***** ea:net.flame / unc-c!dya / 8:18 pm Jul 24, 1984 */ It is truly disgusting to evaluate people on how well their breasts fill out a swimsuit, or whatever the "criteria" are. Aren't we above this yet? -dya- /* ---------- */ Whether it is disgusting to evaluate somebody based on such criteria depends on what you are evaluating them *for*. That kind of evaluation for a job as, say programmer, borders on the criminally irresponsible. For other positions, though, it makes perfect sense. (-: Sorry, I just couldn't resist. Maybe this should have gone to net.singles? :-) Whether such displays should take place on national television is another questions entirely.