Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fisher.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!fisher!david From: david@fisher.UUCP (David Rubin) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Libertarianism Query - (nf) Message-ID: <265@fisher.UUCP> Date: Sat, 11-Aug-84 11:01:22 EDT Article-I.D.: fisher.265 Posted: Sat Aug 11 11:01:22 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 12-Aug-84 01:16:24 EDT References: <130@zinfande.UUCP> <10100076@ea.UUCP> Organization: Princeton Univ. Statistics Lines: 15 Sincere question: If Libertarianism relies so heavily upon litigation for individuals to guard their well-being, does that mean one can infringe the rights of those without the resources to initiate a law suit? Are the poor unable to avail themselves of litigation? Second sincere question: If someone does not have sufficient resources to pay a judgment against themselves, what recourse does the offended party have? Are poor people therefore immune to litigation? David Rubin {allegra|astrovax|princeton}!fisher!david