Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!abh From: abh@ccivax.UUCP (Andrew X. Hudson) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Chuq & Feeelthy Peectures Message-ID: <188@ccivax.UUCP> Date: Mon, 6-Aug-84 14:01:42 EDT Article-I.D.: ccivax.188 Posted: Mon Aug 6 14:01:42 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 8-Aug-84 00:42:14 EDT References: <1252@nsc.UUCP> Organization: CCI Telephony Systems Group, Roch, NY Lines: 24 I really can't see your point of view on this one. I for one read Penthouse. For the Forum not for some inane, useless column like Playboy Adviser. I find the other fiction quite scintilllating. I mean really, what the hell purpose does it serve reading dirty magazines and skipping over all the parts you pay for. And if softcore or subliminal core is your bag why don't you try Cosmopolitan, Vogue, 17, and Good Housekeeping. You'd be surprised at the columns they run. The pictures they run in the adverts, though considered 'safe' for housewives and young impressionable adolescents would certainly raise the eyebrow of any southern bible belting porno sniffer. Of course you can always let your fingers peruse the pages of the Sear's catalog underwear section. Andrew Hudson Presidential Advisor on Pornography -- "Freedom of choice is what you got Freedom from choice is what you want" - DEVO ...[rlgvax | decvax | ucbvax!allegra]!rochester!ritcv!ccivax!abh