Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site allegra.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!root
From: root@allegra.UUCP (Allegra Staff)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Forwarded Message
Message-ID: <2668@allegra.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 5-Aug-84 03:05:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: allegra.2668
Posted: Sun Aug  5 03:05:08 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 5-Aug-84 06:42:58 EDT
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 16

I agree with Tannenbaum: Ken Arndt is a very naughty boy, but finking
on him is not cool.  Let's face it, there are a lot of naughty boys on
net.motss!

So what is all this BS about "invert" versus "pervert".  I don't care
if being gay is learned or inborn.  I don't care if 75 percent of the
population never does it.  I don't care if the Bible says it is bad.  I
don't even care if Ken Arndt says it is bad.

If two motss want to have sex, who are they hurting?  And if they do
hurt each other, isn't straight sex just as "dangerous"?  And what
business is it of anyone else's?  If you want to peek through keyholes,
why don't you get angry at the child molesters and wife beaters.

				Hell hath no fury like...
				"Lance"