Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 6/7/83; site hao.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!bmcg!cepu!hao!ward From: ward@hao.UUCP Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Re: Awaiting scientific creationism (still) Message-ID: <1096@hao.UUCP> Date: Thu, 2-Aug-84 14:14:10 EDT Article-I.D.: hao.1096 Posted: Thu Aug 2 14:14:10 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 3-Aug-84 05:22:55 EDT References: <654@opus.UUCP> Organization: High Altitude Obs./NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 18 [] [Stated yet another way, I'm interested in evaluating creationism, not weighing it against evolutionism. After all, they might both be wrong:-] No, Dick, you just don't understand. Evolution might be wrong. It, after all is science. Scientific Creationism *MUST* be right. It has the same relationship to science as a Democratic People's Republic has to democracy. (or republicacy (or whatever)). Need I put in the :-) ?..........probably -- Michael Ward, NCAR/SCD UUCP: {hplabs,nbires,brl-bmd,seismo,menlo70,stcvax}!hao!sa!ward ARPA: hplabs!hao!sa!ward@Berkeley BELL: 303-497-1252 USPS: POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307