Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert From: seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert) Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal Subject: Re: Novel? idea on drinking and driving? Message-ID: <1285@ihuxl.UUCP> Date: Thu, 9-Aug-84 09:19:13 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxl.1285 Posted: Thu Aug 9 09:19:13 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Aug-84 01:09:13 EDT References: <2175@ihnss.UUCP> <1083@hou4b.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 18 I think the drinking license is probably a good idea (although I hate to see yet more govt interferrence) and is certainly a better idea than roadblocks, taking away drivers licenses, etc. I must object to a mandatory getting-drunk session, though. My body gets enough abuse without the govt insisting on my getting drunk. Not to mention the Biblical warnings about drunkeness. Have this experience *available* to those who want it, but don't make it mandatory for those who have enough intelligence to know not to get drunk (with or without driving). -- _____ /_____\ how in blue blazes do they expect a EE to cook on a gas stove? /_______\ |___| Snoopy ____|___|_____ ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert