Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sdccs6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdccs6!ix21
From: ix21@sdccs6.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.politics,net.legal
Subject: Re: religion and public life: texas
Message-ID: <1672@sdccs6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 1-Aug-84 23:03:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdccs6.1672
Posted: Wed Aug  1 23:03:53 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Aug-84 03:30:11 EDT
References: <927@ulysses.UUCP>
Organization: UCSD Medical School
Lines: 9

Several articles have been debating whether a religious test for
holding a public office is consitutional.  Many people have stated
that such a test violates the 1st admendent.  That has nothing to do
with the debate.  Article six of the consitution specifically states
that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to
any office of the United States or any of its compoment states.
What can be more clearer?