Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site aecom.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd!decwrl!decvax!mcnc!philabs!aecom!naftoli From: naftoli@aecom.UUCP (Robert Berlinger) Newsgroups: net.unix,net.unix-wizards Subject: newgrp(1) - inconsistent Message-ID: <753@aecom.UUCP> Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 14:33:19 EDT Article-I.D.: aecom.753 Posted: Tue Jul 24 14:33:19 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 30-Jul-84 00:06:28 EDT Organization: Albert Einstein Coll. of Med., NY Lines: 9 Why were such pains taken to make the newgrp(1) command overlay the current shell? It seems to me that it's more natural to have it fork off a seperate shell just like su(1) does. In fact, I prefer it that way. Anyone else have any comments? -- Robert Berlinger ...{philabs,cucard,pegasus,ihnp4,rocky2}!aecom!naftoli "If you're not where you are, you're nowhere"