Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!cbosgd!mark@Berkeley.ARPA From: mark@Berkeley.ARPA Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: envelope information Message-ID: <8402220343.AA11347@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Tue, 21-Feb-84 22:43:48 EST Article-I.D.: hou3c.322 Posted: Tue Feb 21 22:43:48 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Feb-84 06:09:19 EST Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 14 If we're going to go this far: Delivering-To: ron@Brl-Vgr Received: From BRL.ARPA by BRL-VGR via smtp; 20 Feb 84 21:38 EST Delivering-To: info-unix@Brl-Vgr Received: From Brl-Vld.ARPA by BRL via smtp; 20 Feb 84 21:30 EST why not just use the existing "for" subfield of Received, as provided in RFC822: Received: From BRL.ARPA by BRL-VGR for ron@Brl-Bgr via smtp; 20 Feb 84 21:38 EST Received: From Brl-Vld.ARPA by BRL for info-unix@Brl-Vgr via smtp; 20 Feb 84 21:30 EST By the way, this DOES seem like a good idea. Mark