Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxa!johnnyr From: johnnyr@ihuxa.UUCP (John R. Rosenberg) Newsgroups: net.general Subject: How GENERAL can you get??? 200SX Info wanted... Message-ID: <387@ihuxa.UUCP> Date: Thu, 23-Feb-84 09:10:12 EST Article-I.D.: ihuxa.387 Posted: Thu Feb 23 09:10:12 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 24-Feb-84 00:57:00 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 24 This is really a flame, and rightfully belongs in net.flame (i'll give you that one), but I felt I needed to send it to net.general to adequately respond to the deluge of mail I got in response to my original 200SX question. I got more mail of a 'this doesn't belong on net.general' nature than I got that actually answered my question. Yes, I sent the original inquiry to both general and auto, and for ggod reasons. Auto is obvious, but what about owners of 200SXs or those who might know a little about them who do not subscribe to net.auto. There are probably quite a few. Do any of you who flamed me about general not subscribe to auto? But I bet you all own cars. Get the point? I'm not trying to be self-righteous, just get the info I need. But it seems that there are those out there who feel that they need to be the guardians of the morality of using net.general. To them I respond... If you don't like it, don't read it! How tough is it to just skip by? Enough said. John Rosenberg at AT&T Technologies {ihnp4!} ihuxa!johnnyr Naperville, Il.