Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site denelcor.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!denelcor!lmc From: lmc@denelcor.UUCP (Lyle McElhaney) Newsgroups: net.legal Subject: re: Defense..., etc. Message-ID: <319@denelcor.UUCP> Date: Wed, 8-Feb-84 22:47:58 EST Article-I.D.: denelcor.319 Posted: Wed Feb 8 22:47:58 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Feb-84 06:53:16 EST References: <1248@mhuxd.UUCP> Organization: Denelcor, Aurora, CO Lines: 11 A very good friend of mine got the same kind of justice in Southern California several years ago, right after that book came out. He had witnesses who swore that he was under the limit, but the judge declared him guilty. He was allowed to talk to the judge in his chambers after the trial, where the judge said he sympathized, but could not set a precedent which could call into question all the previous cases involving the radar. The judge said that my friend could, of course, appeal; whereupon my friend left, remarking that he "had had enough justice for one day." -- Lyle McElhaney (hao,brl-bmd,nbires,csu-cs,scgvaxd)!denelcor!lmc