Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cbosgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!mark
From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: DEC ENET manging headers
Message-ID: <997@cbosgd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-Feb-84 10:17:35 EST
Article-I.D.: cbosgd.997
Posted: Tue Feb 21 10:17:35 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 22-Feb-84 02:02:02 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus
Lines: 31

Would the person at DEC responsible for the gateway into ENET please
track down and fix this problem?  I've been seeing a lot of traffic
from ENET lately with mangled headers.  The subject contains no
useful information, and the sender is wrong.  Here is an example:
Note that the BODY of the message contains what were apparently
intended to be the headers.

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cbosgd.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: cbosgd!mhuxl!ihnp4!harpo!decvax!decwrl!lipman
From: lipman@decwrl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.women.only
Subject: id AA18915; Mon, 20 Feb 84 13:35:51 pst
Message-ID: <5712@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-Feb-84 16:36:00 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.5712
Posted: Mon Feb 20 16:36:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Feb-84 05:46:23 EST
Sender: lipman@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Western Research Lab, Los Altos, CA
Lines: 30

Message-Id: <8402202135.AA18915@decwrl.arpa>
Date: Monday, 20 Feb 1984 13:28:40-PST
From: amber::chabot  (Lisa Chabot)
To: net.women.only
Subject: re: proposed mailing list

About the mailing list:

(remainder of message deleted)