Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site drux3.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!drutx!drux3!trb
From: trb@drux3.UUCP (Buckley)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Phil Karn and other CD nuts, please read!
Message-ID: <1043@drux3.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-Feb-84 14:14:55 EST
Article-I.D.: drux3.1043
Posted: Fri Feb  3 14:14:55 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 04:27:36 EST
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 22



Phil Karn, 

	Get off it!  You obviously have never understood what Phil
Rastocny is trying to say, and you obviously have some anti-analog 
bias that for some reason is clouding your judgement (not to mention 
your hearing).

	One wonders if you can really tell the difference in audio
subtleties.  A newcomer to wine-tasting would think two similar wines
taste exactly the same.  A newcomer to audio probably couldn't tell
the difference between two similar high-quality systems.  I think
that describes you, Phil.

	The second-generation CDs are VERY good.  Better than most
analog systems.  BUT, today's state-of-the-art analog is BETTER, and it
makes for an enjoyable listening experience.  Try it sometime.
(And that goes for you, too, rabbit!jj).
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Buckley
...drux3!trb