Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!mhuxl!mhuxm!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: laws against silliness
Message-ID: <443@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Feb-84 12:14:41 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.443
Posted: Mon Feb  6 12:14:41 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 07:19:49 EST
References: <5394@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Organization: Central Services Org., Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 19


Currently, there is a bill in Congress that would make silliness a crime.
					B.C.Mather
					Le Maitre
					uiucdcs!uicsl!mather

But that would be a silly bill.  Therefore if passed, it would be deemed
illegal and revoked.  But then it wouldn't be, meaning that it would be
reinstated and ...  (* SIGH *)!

                       See you all in Tumbolia!
                       Ken Kaufman
*********************************
You are both forgetting that the Constitution clearly states (somewhere, just
before the naughty bits) that Congress cannot pass a law that would cause it to
abolish itself.
-- 
Pardon me for breathing...
	Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr