Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site qplx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!zehntel!dual!qplx!stv From: stv@qplx.UUCP (Steve Vance) Newsgroups: net.movies,net.video Subject: Re: x-rated movies Message-ID: <269@qplx.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Feb-84 17:02:35 EST Article-I.D.: qplx.269 Posted: Mon Feb 20 17:02:35 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Feb-84 04:41:21 EST References: <1663@rocksvax.UUCP> Organization: MDS Qantel, Hayward CA. Lines: 18 [ guess what this line is for ] There are two criteria (at least) for evaluating x-rated movies: (1) How good it is compared to other motion pictures (plot, characters, etc) and (2) its prurience, how aroused you get while you watch it. Although both are subjective, I have *never* seen a good x-rated movie according to criterion (1). If you are looking for such movies (heh, heh), you will have a hard time (oops! sorry) finding any. With that in mind, places to look for comparisons between x-rated movies include: Pocket Books #46844-8 "Adult Movies", $3.95. Has em all thru '82. Video Review magazine reviews one or two per month. This exhausts my list (what kind of pervert do you think I am?), but I imagine that other magazines would have reviews of x-rated movies; try Penthouse, Hustler, those kind of magazines.