Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!Clocksin%edxa@ucl-cs.arpa
From: Clocksin%edxa@ucl-cs.arpa
Newsgroups: net.ai
Subject: AIList entry
Message-ID: <16309@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Jan-84 14:11:37 EST
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.16309
Posted: Thu Jan 26 14:11:37 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 03:43:15 EST
Lines: 9

From:  BILL (on ERCC DEC-10) 

In reference to a previous AIList correspondent wishing to know more about
Arnold Arnold's "proof" of Fermat's Last Theorem, last week's issue of
New Scientist explains all.  The "proof" is faulty, as expected.
Mr Arnold is a self-styled "cybernetician" who has a history of grabbing
headlines with announcements of revolutionary results which are later
proven faulty on trivial grounds.  I suppose A.I. has to put up with
its share of circle squarers and angle trisecters.