Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!cbosgd!mark@Berkeley.ARPA
From: mark@Berkeley.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re:  envelope information
Message-ID: <8402220343.AA11347@cbosgd.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-Feb-84 22:43:48 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.322
Posted: Tue Feb 21 22:43:48 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Feb-84 06:09:19 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 14

If we're going to go this far:
	Delivering-To:  ron@Brl-Vgr
	Received: From BRL.ARPA by BRL-VGR via smtp;  20 Feb 84 21:38 EST
	Delivering-To:  info-unix@Brl-Vgr
	Received: From Brl-Vld.ARPA by BRL via smtp;  20 Feb 84 21:30 EST
why not just use the existing "for" subfield of Received,
as provided in RFC822:
	Received: From BRL.ARPA by BRL-VGR for ron@Brl-Bgr
		via smtp;  20 Feb 84 21:38 EST
	Received: From Brl-Vld.ARPA by BRL for info-unix@Brl-Vgr
		via smtp;  20 Feb 84 21:30 EST
By the way, this DOES seem like a good idea.
	
	Mark