Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!chris
From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: more startup time; tset vs. noglob
Message-ID: <5032@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Feb-84 23:06:43 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.5032
Posted: Wed Feb  8 23:06:43 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 10-Feb-84 03:45:47 EST
References: <2478@fortune.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 15

Re:
	From: rpw3@fortune.UUCP

	Spencer, the "set noglob" would NOT be too late (at least on our
	fairly stock 4.1bsd).

Sorry, but Spencer's right.  The reason your test worked, while the
"tset" invocation doesn't, is that tset is invoked inside backquotes.
When tset produces things like "li#24:co#80" the C shell interprets
everything from the first # on as a comment.  The set noglob apparently
doesn't get around it.  (This is on a fairly old 4.1BSD system.)
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci
UUCP:	{seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris@umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris.umcp-cs@CSNet-Relay