Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxa!johnnyr
From: johnnyr@ihuxa.UUCP (John R. Rosenberg)
Newsgroups: net.general
Subject: How GENERAL can you get??? 200SX Info wanted...
Message-ID: <387@ihuxa.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Feb-84 09:10:12 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxa.387
Posted: Thu Feb 23 09:10:12 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 24-Feb-84 00:57:00 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 24

This is really a flame, and rightfully belongs in net.flame (i'll give you
that one), but I felt I needed to send it to net.general to adequately
respond to the deluge of mail I got in response to my original 200SX question.
 
I got more mail of a 'this doesn't belong on net.general' nature than I got
that actually answered my question. Yes, I sent the original inquiry to
both general and auto, and for ggod reasons. Auto is obvious, but what
about owners of 200SXs or those who might know a little about them who
do not subscribe to net.auto. There are probably quite a few. Do any of
you who flamed me about general not subscribe to auto? But I bet you all
own cars. Get the point?
 
I'm not trying to be self-righteous, just get the info I need. But it seems
that there are those out there who feel that they need to be the guardians
of the morality of using net.general. To them I respond...
 
             If you don't like it, don't read it!
 
How tough is it to just skip by? Enough said.
 
                          John Rosenberg at AT&T Technologies
                          {ihnp4!} ihuxa!johnnyr  Naperville, Il.