Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ulysses!burl!we13!ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision!uw-beaver!laser-lovers From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver (laser-lovers) Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers Subject: WASHINGTON.ARPA mailer was obliged to send this message in 50-byte Message-ID: <828@uw-beaver> Date: Sun, 5-Feb-84 22:37:07 EST Article-I.D.: uw-beave.828 Posted: Sun Feb 5 22:37:07 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 08:38:11 EST Sender: root@uw-beave Organization: U of Washington Computer Science Lines: 21 From obrien@Rand-Unix Sun Feb 5 19:37:01 1984 individually Pushed segments because normal TCP stream transmission timed out. This probably indicates a problem with the receiving TCP or SMTP server. See your site's software support if you have any questions. Return-Path:Received: from rand-unix by WASHINGTON.ARPA with TCP; Sun 5 Feb 84 15:06:09-PST Date: Sunday, 5 Feb 1984 14:53-PST To: Doug Kingston Cc: Christopher A Kent , laser-lovers@WASHINGTON Subject: Re: Re: IBM 6670p? In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 31 Jan 84 20:31:20 EST. From: obrien@Rand-Unix (Michael_OBrien) ReSent-date: Sun 5 Feb 84 19:27:48-PST ReSent-from: Richard Furuta ReSent-to: "Laser Lovers": ; On the other hand, let us note that we got in a 2700 to see if we could possibly flush our 6670 (we hate it too) and found that the 2700 was just so egregiously slow that we couldn't live with it. We bought another 6670. *sigh*