Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!farber@udel-ee.arpa From: farber@udel-ee.arpa Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: DOS 2.1 Fix (and yet again, IBM did not tell us) Message-ID: <16657@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Mon, 13-Feb-84 22:00:17 EST Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.16657 Posted: Mon Feb 13 22:00:17 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Feb-84 04:13:39 EST Lines: 28 From: Dave FarberI asked on Compuserve about a real nasty I found with DOS 2.1 and got this answer. Why are we not told about such things by IBM? Dave ________________________________________________________________ #: 29301 Sec. 0 - General Information Sb: #29222-DOS 2.1 12-Feb-84 14:43:32 Fm: John Chapman 70205,1217 To: Dave Farber 76010,104 (X) Dave: did you REFORMAT your hard disk with DOS 2.1? - There's a known problem with DOS 2.0 format that is corrected in 2.1.. I've had similar problems on both an XT/10M and an APPARAT/PC 27M drive: copy , alleged O.K. (with verify on) then access to the data produces DISK/DATA ERROR WHILE READING DRIVE [d: This is supposed to be generated because DOS 2.0 format can't correctly label two consecutive bad tracks, or something like that; I reformatted my HD's when 2.1 arrived; AND I HAVEN'T HAD THE PROBLEM SINCE .. if you didn't reformat, I'd suggest doing that, even if it's a hassle dumping stuff... you might find some more trashed files during the BACKUP (I did) ....See Ya... John <>