Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!ron@brl-vgr.ARPA
From: ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re:  envelope information
Message-ID: <319@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-Feb-84 15:30:21 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.319
Posted: Tue Feb 21 15:30:21 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Feb-84 01:37:24 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 24
To: Mark Crispin 
Cc: ROODE@sri-nic.arpa

I endorse the Currently-To: idea.  It can be done without destroying
the BCC protection for example it could be intermixed with the Recieved
lines.

   Delivering-To:  ron@Brl-Vgr
   Received: From BRL.ARPA by BRL-VGR via smtp;  20 Feb 84 21:38 EST
   Delivering-To:  info-unix@Brl-Vgr
   Received: From Brl-Vld.ARPA by BRL via smtp;  20 Feb 84 21:30 EST
   Date:     Mon, 20 Feb 84 21:29:06 EST
   From:     Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) 
   To:       hnij@bnl
   cc:       info-unix@brl
   Subject:  Re:  file descriptors --> filenames

In the above example the letter was Recieved on BRL from the user on
the host BRL-VLD.  INFO-UNIX@BRL routes to INFO-UNIX@BRL-VGR.  It is
the received there.  INFO-UNIX is expanded and in turn delivered to
me (RON@BRL-VGR).

Our mail system, as well as others tries to keep the number of copies
of a message down, this might be circumvented by adding these extra
lines which make several slightly subtle changes.

-Ron