Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sb1!sb6!bpa!burdvax!sjuvax!armstron
From: armstron@sjuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.comics
Subject: Re: Whats going on?
Message-ID: <166@sjuvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Feb-84 11:48:03 EST
Article-I.D.: sjuvax.166
Posted: Thu Feb 16 11:48:03 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Feb-84 03:11:27 EST
References: <1692@rlgvax.UUCP>, <4848@rochester.UUCP>
Organization: Saint Josephs Univ. Phila., Pa.
Lines: 14


	I agree with you on some points, but certainly not on RONIN.  While
Miller's (fantastic in my mind) art is "different", I would certainly not
call it "scratchy".  The  connotation here is much too negative.  I rather
prefer to see Miller's art as innovative and stylish.  It, unlike most
comic art of today (not that I don't like comic art... I do !) challenges
the reader to pick up the Miller's mental image of this futuristic land
and the complex science it  subscribes to; therefore, Miller's art is 
also complex...	
	Oh well, it was a good thought anyway.

				Return of the Dragon,
				Len Armstrong
				St. Joseph's University.