Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ll1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ll1!cej
From: cej@ll1.UUCP (Chuck Jones)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: An alternative to net.religion subgroups
Message-ID: <213@ll1.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Feb-84 21:45:51 EST
Article-I.D.: ll1.213
Posted: Thu Feb 16 21:45:51 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Feb-84 01:34:43 EST
References: <366@ittral.UUCP>
Organization: Chicago, Illinois
Lines: 23

[]

	After taking Dan Pellegrino's advice, and thinking it about
it, I think I tend to agree with Dan's idea about a group or
subgroup for the religion/anti-religion debate.  Actually the
evolution/creation debate could also be moved to the same group,
since it's really the same discussion at heart.  I think we all
could agree that there certainly is enough traffic on this topic for
it to rate its own group, and it doesn't seem that the discussion is
tapering off, or ever will.

	The only problem would be keeping the traffic in the group. 
I get the feeling that if the pro-religion side unsubscibed, the con
side would gravitate back to net.religion, and if the pro-evolution
side left, things would gravitate to net.physics.

	I think something like this may have been suggested some
time before, but there is a LOT of traffic.

	(BTW, I'm pro on one issue, con on the other, and not sure
if I would subscribe to the group.)

..we13!ll1!cej		Chuck Jones	AT&T Communications