Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1h.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!ihu1h!ajaym From: ajaym@ihu1h.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Seatbelt discussion -- new twist Message-ID: <150@ihu1h.UUCP> Date: Fri, 27-Jan-84 15:49:53 EST Article-I.D.: ihu1h.150 Posted: Fri Jan 27 15:49:53 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 31-Jan-84 02:21:56 EST References: <93@whuxj.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 11 At one time, I didnt wear seatbelts either for the same reason. In fact, I had a relative who sustained a serious injury because he wore them. But, at some point, I was shown statistics that appeared to be reliable, (i.e. they were sponsored by both a government agency and a comsumer interest group), and correct. I cant remember where they appeared, but logic says I have the best odds if I follow 'reliable' statistics. While on the subject, did anyone see the news Thusday night where a court reduced the payment received by a crash victim from approx. $1 million to about $10,000 because no seatbelts were worn. Interesting to say the least.