Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!mhuxl!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj From: jj@rabbit.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: 1 Message-ID: <2446@rabbit.UUCP> Date: Mon, 30-Jan-84 13:10:14 EST Article-I.D.: rabbit.2446 Posted: Mon Jan 30 13:10:14 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 5-Feb-84 10:27:24 EST References: <292@tty3b.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill Lines: 36 Hey! Mike! I like your numbers! 80% of the US supports the nuclear freeze, you say. Ok, where is it that you got those numbers? Let me put it another way, which liar are you quoting? Really, Mike, regardless of whether or not you like nuclear weapons quoting such sorts of claims are just unforgivable. Whom do you quote? Please give a reference, and an explaination of how the numbers were generated. Hell, Mike, nobody likes nuclear weapons. That's not in doubt.Self-preservation in the face of nuclear weaponry isn't the same question. History has shown repeatedly that one cannot depend on the good will of any government, especially a totalitarain one. The totalitarian one, in this case, has weapons. Can't say as I like that either. The answer, naturally, just isn't the simplistic one that you would have us believe. A few weeks ago you were prating about the "simplified" view of the world that the Reagan adminstration had about economics. You are doing the same thing, so I think you should subject yourself to the same penalties that you suggested for the Reagan administration. Enough! -- TEDDY BEARS ARE PEOPLE, TOO! (allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj