Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!cbosgd!cbscc!pmd
From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.physics
Subject: Re: Creationism and perspective
Message-ID: <1620@cbscc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 2-Feb-84 14:39:41 EST
Article-I.D.: cbscc.1620
Posted: Thu Feb  2 14:39:41 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 01:46:53 EST
References: <859@ihuxm.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus
Lines: 14

What a double standard.  It sounds good, but I suppose it wouldn't
work the other way around.  Holes in creationist theories expose it
as "pseudoscience", but no matter how great the problems for evolution
we are supposed to  view them as great opportunities for discovery.
  
Enough nit-picking.  If someone is willing to read the original article
carefully and explain to me why there is any good reason that abiogenesis
ever occurred I will gladly listen.  Labeling it has "shallow commentary"
doesn't say anything.

Also, you shouldn't be spreading this discussion to net.physics.  The 
people there don't like it.  Keep it in net.misc. OK?

Paul Dubuc