Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site teklds.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!archiel From: archiel@teklds.UUCP (Archie Lachner) Newsgroups: net.movies.sw Subject: Re: It *is NOT* Endor! - (nf) Message-ID: <157@teklds.UUCP> Date: Wed, 8-Feb-84 14:49:36 EST Article-I.D.: teklds.157 Posted: Wed Feb 8 14:49:36 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Feb-84 09:07:20 EST References: <4307@hp-pcd.UUCP>, <648@dciem.UUCP> <2450@fortune.UUCP> Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 15 A "moon orbiting empty space" would tend to violate some rather fundamental laws of physics. Perhaps more is being read into the "moon of Endor" line than is really there. It sounds reasonable, as others have suggested, to interpret the phrase in the same vein as one would "the city of New York" or "the state of Ohio." Perhaps some light could be shed on any reason for doing otherwise, at least within the limits of the logical analysis of something in a work of science fiction (after all how serious should we get about this, anyway?). -- Archie Lachner uucp: {ucbvax,decvax,pur-ee,cbosg,ihnss}!tektronix!teklds!archiel CSnet: archiel@tek ARPAnet: archiel.tek@rand-relay