Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles - hp internal release 1.2; site hpcnoa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcnoa!rmd
From: rmd@hpcnoa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Analog vs. Digital Challenge
Message-ID: <30200021@hpcnoa.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 18-Feb-84 21:43:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hpcnoa.30200021
Posted: Sat Feb 18 21:43:00 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 08:25:27 EST
References: <2427@utah-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO
Lines: 7
Nf-ID: #R:utah-cs:-242700:hpcnoa:30200021:000:316
Nf-From: hpcnoa!rmd    Feb  2 18:43:00 1984

There was an article in Audio  magazine a couple of months ago reporting
the results of Dick Burwen's  experiments with digital  recording.  This
is close to what you're  asking for, but just one man's  opinion and the
tests were certainly not 'double blind' or even very well controlled.

Rick Dow
inhp4!hpfcla!rmd