Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA From: MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: "Return-Path" vs. "From" Message-ID: <247@hou3c.UUCP> Date: Wed, 8-Feb-84 09:20:00 EST Article-I.D.: hou3c.247 Posted: Wed Feb 8 09:20:00 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 10-Feb-84 07:20:23 EST Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 20 To: MRC@SU-SCORE Cc: cic@CSNET-CIC.ARPA In-Reply-To: The message of Tue 7 Feb 84 12:29:30-PST from Mark CrispinFrom: Mark Crispin ... It isn't totally unreasonable for the From or Reply fields to be a "meaningful" address, such as "Mark.Crispin@Stanford" (which we fully intend to support in the near future) ... -------------------- How soon do you expect to support such an address? Is this "institutional" host-alias name, "Stanford", likely to become a sub-domain in a reasonable length of time? How many other institutions have, or are planning, the same kind of host-aliases? (We have two at BBN -- BBN, for the TENEX/TOPS-20 hosts and BBN-UNIX. There is also "OFFICE" at TYMSHARE.) ---Charlotte