Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site cwruecmp.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!cwruecmp!decot From: decot@cwruecmp.UUCP (Dave Decot) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: net.natsci Message-ID: <991@cwruecmp.UUCP> Date: Sun, 12-Feb-84 17:26:06 EST Article-I.D.: cwruecmp.991 Posted: Sun Feb 12 17:26:06 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 14-Feb-84 01:33:25 EST References: <489@uofm-cv.UUCP> Organization: CWRU Computer Engr. Cleveland, Ohio Lines: 9 We already have net.bio, and net.physics. Discussions of chemistry don't come up too often, and when they do, they seem to fit well into one of these two categories. Anyway, most pronunciations of "natsci" imply that it should be a subgroup of net.politics. Is there anybody who is really sick and tired of hearing about natural science issues in any of our newsgroups? If not, we don't need a group for it. Dave Decot "Non-Americans are people, too." decvax!cwruecmp!decot (Decot.Case@rand-relay)