Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!ron@brl-vgr.ARPA From: ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie) Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: envelope information Message-ID: <319@hou3c.UUCP> Date: Tue, 21-Feb-84 15:30:21 EST Article-I.D.: hou3c.319 Posted: Tue Feb 21 15:30:21 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Feb-84 01:37:24 EST Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 24 To: Mark CrispinCc: ROODE@sri-nic.arpa I endorse the Currently-To: idea. It can be done without destroying the BCC protection for example it could be intermixed with the Recieved lines. Delivering-To: ron@Brl-Vgr Received: From BRL.ARPA by BRL-VGR via smtp; 20 Feb 84 21:38 EST Delivering-To: info-unix@Brl-Vgr Received: From Brl-Vld.ARPA by BRL via smtp; 20 Feb 84 21:30 EST Date: Mon, 20 Feb 84 21:29:06 EST From: Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) To: hnij@bnl cc: info-unix@brl Subject: Re: file descriptors --> filenames In the above example the letter was Recieved on BRL from the user on the host BRL-VLD. INFO-UNIX@BRL routes to INFO-UNIX@BRL-VGR. It is the received there. INFO-UNIX is expanded and in turn delivered to me (RON@BRL-VGR). Our mail system, as well as others tries to keep the number of copies of a message down, this might be circumvented by adding these extra lines which make several slightly subtle changes. -Ron