Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!akgua!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!houxm!hou2g!yraurb
From: yraurb@hou2g.UUCP (G.DECKER)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Bose and Linear Trackers
Message-ID: <161@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 7-Feb-84 10:40:38 EST
Article-I.D.: hou2g.161
Posted: Tue Feb  7 10:40:38 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 23:19:05 EST
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 15

In response to Mark Malleltt:

I think that it was in the January Grammophone that I read an article written
by a European officer of the AES who visited the Bose factory during a recent
visit.  He explained to Amar that he felt tht there was perhaps a difference
between the Bose philosophy in playback and the typical European approach
to miking /monitoring.  In any case, the author said that Amar listened 
patiently and then offered some very convincing arguments (both scientific
and demonstration wise) to support the Direct/Reflecting method.  The author
also stated that he frelt that the 9012's were capable of some very musical
sounds.

I think I remenmber reading about a Technics sld-3? in the new products section
of Stereo Review of r High Fidelity a few months ago. A linear tracker with 
pitch control.