Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!cbosgd!cbscc!pmd From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc) Newsgroups: net.misc,net.physics Subject: Re: Creationism and perspective Message-ID: <1620@cbscc.UUCP> Date: Thu, 2-Feb-84 14:39:41 EST Article-I.D.: cbscc.1620 Posted: Thu Feb 2 14:39:41 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 01:46:53 EST References: <859@ihuxm.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 14 What a double standard. It sounds good, but I suppose it wouldn't work the other way around. Holes in creationist theories expose it as "pseudoscience", but no matter how great the problems for evolution we are supposed to view them as great opportunities for discovery. Enough nit-picking. If someone is willing to read the original article carefully and explain to me why there is any good reason that abiogenesis ever occurred I will gladly listen. Labeling it has "shallow commentary" doesn't say anything. Also, you shouldn't be spreading this discussion to net.physics. The people there don't like it. Keep it in net.misc. OK? Paul Dubuc