Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cbosgd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!mark From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) Newsgroups: net.news Subject: DEC ENET manging headers Message-ID: <997@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Tue, 21-Feb-84 10:17:35 EST Article-I.D.: cbosgd.997 Posted: Tue Feb 21 10:17:35 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Feb-84 02:02:02 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 31 Would the person at DEC responsible for the gateway into ENET please track down and fix this problem? I've been seeing a lot of traffic from ENET lately with mangled headers. The subject contains no useful information, and the sender is wrong. Here is an example: Note that the BODY of the message contains what were apparently intended to be the headers. Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cbosgd.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: cbosgd!mhuxl!ihnp4!harpo!decvax!decwrl!lipman From: lipman@decwrl.UUCP Newsgroups: net.women.only Subject: id AA18915; Mon, 20 Feb 84 13:35:51 pst Message-ID: <5712@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Feb-84 16:36:00 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.5712 Posted: Mon Feb 20 16:36:00 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 21-Feb-84 05:46:23 EST Sender: lipman@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Western Research Lab, Los Altos, CA Lines: 30 Message-Id: <8402202135.AA18915@decwrl.arpa> Date: Monday, 20 Feb 1984 13:28:40-PST From: amber::chabot (Lisa Chabot) To: net.women.only Subject: re: proposed mailing list About the mailing list: (remainder of message deleted)