Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site aluxp.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!aluxp!wrbull From: wrbull@aluxp.UUCP (bullman) Newsgroups: net.columbia Subject: Re: Orbiting Debris Found Message-ID: <1183@aluxp.UUCP> Date: Mon, 6-Feb-84 20:14:57 EST Article-I.D.: aluxp.1183 Posted: Mon Feb 6 20:14:57 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 10:00:21 EST References: <2573@alice.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Allentown, PA Lines: 6 NASA reported that the second satellite also failed to achieve its intended orbit. One of the network news reported that the PAM was a solid booster, but I find that hard to believe since solids are not solid booster, But thats hard to believe since solids are not really that "delicate" to put a payload in geosynch. Does anybody know what propellant the PAM uses?