Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site shark.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!shark!tims From: tims@shark.UUCP (Tim Stoehr) Newsgroups: net.motss Subject: Re: NAMBLA RESOLUTION Message-ID: <242@shark.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Jan-84 14:17:58 EST Article-I.D.: shark.242 Posted: Thu Jan 26 14:17:58 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 3-Feb-84 02:39:53 EST Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR. Lines: 21 I just got through reading NAMBLA's "RESOLUTION ON THE LIBERATION OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH," and the following came to mind. Articles I-IX talk about self-determination, end to racism etc, only the last one refers specifically to sexuality. Although the previous articles certainly encompass and imply sexual freedom. The tenth article then comes out and specifically mentions sexual freedom. Why? It's obvious by reading the list that the last article summarize and focuses the intent of the entire resolution; that NAMBLA desires the freedom and acceptance of man/boy "love". The rest is just a cloud screen. After all, they're not the "North American Child Freedom Association." Their organization is aimed at man/boy relationships, child self-determination is just a convenient means to that end. Now, for the important part, do any of you folks out there have any daughters you could introduce me to? The age group 9-12 is preferred, an interest in oral sex is also desirable. You see, I want these girls to become self-determining, my personal pleasure has nothing to do with it. I just want to help these girls to become free-thinking individuals, a noble cause, you must agree. (I'm such a saint)