Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert
From: seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: 55 mph is Dumb
Message-ID: <879@ihuxl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 2-Feb-84 08:52:30 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxl.879
Posted: Thu Feb  2 08:52:30 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 7-Feb-84 15:35:33 EST
References: <517@pyuxa.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 34

> For Snoopy and all those who have been telling me I am wrong about the
> 55 mph speed limit.

HOLD IT! I did *not* tell you you were wrong about 55, I tried to
suggest that you reconsider destroying someone's car.

>  I think it is a crock too.

At least we agree on *something*.

> I think the speed limit should go back to 65, where it is feasible,
> and tailgaters be shot on sight.  That goes for traffic weavers too.

How about 165? That would make a dandy limit.  Anyone exceeding
165 (that's mph, not kph) could have the book thrown at them.
Let's not suggest shooting people.  Everyone makes mistakes once in
awhile.  Have you ever in your life, even for a second, tailgated
someone? (That's in *their* opinion, not yours, remember!) Would
you like to be shot just for bothering someone and/or reducing
the safety factor for a short period of time?

> T. C. Wheeler (When the going gets tough, the tough go drinking)

If you want to kill your brain/liver/etc, that's fine. Just don't
try to drive afterwords. (at any speed)

This is getting ridiculous. Where'd that 'u' key go?

-- 
		_____
	       /_____\		from the flying doghouse of
	      /_______\			Snoopy
		|___|	
	    ____|___|_____	    ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert