Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: notesfiles - hp internal release 1.2; site hpcnoa.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!hpcnoa!rmd From: rmd@hpcnoa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: Analog vs. Digital Challenge Message-ID: <30200021@hpcnoa.UUCP> Date: Sat, 18-Feb-84 21:43:00 EST Article-I.D.: hpcnoa.30200021 Posted: Sat Feb 18 21:43:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 08:25:27 EST References: <2427@utah-cs.UUCP> Organization: Hewlett-Packard - Fort Collins, CO Lines: 7 Nf-ID: #R:utah-cs:-242700:hpcnoa:30200021:000:316 Nf-From: hpcnoa!rmd Feb 2 18:43:00 1984 There was an article in Audio magazine a couple of months ago reporting the results of Dick Burwen's experiments with digital recording. This is close to what you're asking for, but just one man's opinion and the tests were certainly not 'double blind' or even very well controlled. Rick Dow inhp4!hpfcla!rmd