Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site qplx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!zehntel!dual!qplx!stv
From: stv@qplx.UUCP (Steve Vance)
Newsgroups: net.movies,net.video
Subject: Re: x-rated movies
Message-ID: <269@qplx.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 20-Feb-84 17:02:35 EST
Article-I.D.: qplx.269
Posted: Mon Feb 20 17:02:35 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Feb-84 04:41:21 EST
References: <1663@rocksvax.UUCP>
Organization: MDS Qantel, Hayward CA.
Lines: 18

[ guess what this line is for ]

There are two criteria (at least) for evaluating x-rated movies: 
(1) How good it is compared to other motion pictures (plot, 
characters, etc) and (2) its prurience, how aroused you get
while you watch it.  Although both are subjective, I have *never*
seen a good x-rated movie according to criterion (1).  If you are
looking for such movies (heh, heh), you will have a hard time (oops!
sorry) finding any.  With that in mind, places to look for comparisons
between x-rated movies include:

Pocket Books #46844-8 "Adult Movies", $3.95.  Has em all thru '82.
Video Review magazine reviews one or two per month.

This exhausts my list (what kind of pervert do you think I am?), but
I imagine that other magazines would have reviews of x-rated movies;
try Penthouse, Hustler, those kind of magazines.