Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccieng2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccieng5!ccieng2!bwm
From: bwm@ccieng2.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: LIBNETTERS READ
Message-ID: <121@ccieng2.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-Feb-84 12:15:26 EST
Article-I.D.: ccieng2.121
Posted: Wed Feb 15 12:15:26 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 16-Feb-84 05:49:36 EST
References: <567@pyuxa.UUCP>
Organization: Computer Consoles Inc., Rochester, NY
Lines: 16

You have all the insight of a baseball bat. Specifically: YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to tell
me what I can and cannot do with my body. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to tell me what is and
is not MORAL, because those are decisions I MUST make for myself.

THIS DOES NOT IMPLY that I am not responsible for my actions. If I take PCP and
put someone in a hospital, then I bloody well SHOULD be shot (preferably). There
is a difference between what is unethical and what is illegal. I maintain that
legality is nothing. If you catch me doing 60 in a 55mph zone, you have to 
PROVE I WAS ENDANGERING THE PUBLIC, not just quote a 55mph law. Etc.

Nuff said. I think most other arguments from this point are obvious.

A Libertarian

-- 
...[rlgvax, ritcv]!ccieng5!ccieng2!bwm