Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ulysses!burl!we13!ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision!uw-beaver!laser-lovers
From: laser-lovers@uw-beaver (laser-lovers)
Newsgroups: fa.laser-lovers
Subject: WASHINGTON.ARPA mailer was obliged to send this message in 50-byte
Message-ID: <828@uw-beaver>
Date: Sun, 5-Feb-84 22:37:07 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.828
Posted: Sun Feb  5 22:37:07 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 08:38:11 EST
Sender: root@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 21

From obrien@Rand-Unix Sun Feb  5 19:37:01 1984
 individually Pushed segments because normal TCP stream transmission
 timed out.  This probably indicates a problem with the receiving TCP
 or SMTP server.  See your site's software support if you have any questions.
Return-Path: 
Received: from rand-unix by WASHINGTON.ARPA with TCP; Sun 5 Feb 84 15:06:09-PST
Date: Sunday,  5 Feb 1984 14:53-PST
To: Doug Kingston 
Cc: Christopher A Kent , laser-lovers@WASHINGTON
Subject: Re:  Re:  IBM 6670p?
In-reply-to: Your message of     Tue, 31 Jan 84 20:31:20 EST.
From: obrien@Rand-Unix (Michael_OBrien)
ReSent-date: Sun 5 Feb 84 19:27:48-PST
ReSent-from: Richard Furuta 
ReSent-to: "Laser Lovers": ;


	On the other hand, let us note that we got in a 2700 to see if we
could possibly flush our 6670 (we hate it too) and found that the 2700 was
just so egregiously slow that we couldn't live with it.  We bought another
6670.  *sigh*