Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site cwruecmp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!cwruecmp!decot
From: decot@cwruecmp.UUCP (Dave Decot)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.natsci
Message-ID: <991@cwruecmp.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 12-Feb-84 17:26:06 EST
Article-I.D.: cwruecmp.991
Posted: Sun Feb 12 17:26:06 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 14-Feb-84 01:33:25 EST
References: <489@uofm-cv.UUCP>
Organization: CWRU Computer Engr. Cleveland, Ohio
Lines: 9

We already have net.bio, and net.physics.  Discussions of chemistry don't come
up too often, and when they do, they seem to fit well into one of these two
categories.  Anyway, most pronunciations of "natsci" imply that it
should be a subgroup of net.politics.  Is there anybody who is really sick
and tired of hearing about natural science issues in any of our newsgroups?
If not, we don't need a group for it.

Dave Decot		 "Non-Americans are people, too."
decvax!cwruecmp!decot    (Decot.Case@rand-relay)