Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site shark.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!shark!tims
From: tims@shark.UUCP (Tim Stoehr)
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: NAMBLA RESOLUTION
Message-ID: <242@shark.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Jan-84 14:17:58 EST
Article-I.D.: shark.242
Posted: Thu Jan 26 14:17:58 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Feb-84 02:39:53 EST
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR.
Lines: 21

I just got through reading NAMBLA's "RESOLUTION ON THE LIBERATION OF
CHILDREN AND YOUTH," and the following came to mind.

Articles I-IX talk about self-determination, end to racism etc,
only the last one refers specifically to sexuality.  Although the
previous articles certainly encompass and imply sexual freedom.  The
tenth article then comes out and specifically mentions sexual freedom.
Why?  It's obvious by reading the list that the last article
summarize and focuses the intent of the entire resolution; that
NAMBLA desires the freedom and acceptance of man/boy "love".  The
rest is just a cloud screen.  After all, they're not the
"North American Child Freedom Association."  Their organization
is aimed at man/boy relationships, child self-determination is
just a convenient means to that end.

Now, for the important part, do any of you folks out there have any
daughters you could introduce me to?  The age group 9-12 is preferred,
an interest in oral sex is also desirable.  You see, I want these
girls to become self-determining, my personal pleasure has nothing to
do with it.  I just want to help these girls to become free-thinking
individuals, a noble cause, you must agree. (I'm such a saint)