Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ll1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ll1!cej From: cej@ll1.UUCP (Chuck Jones) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: Re: An alternative to net.religion subgroups Message-ID: <213@ll1.UUCP> Date: Thu, 16-Feb-84 21:45:51 EST Article-I.D.: ll1.213 Posted: Thu Feb 16 21:45:51 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Feb-84 01:34:43 EST References: <366@ittral.UUCP> Organization: Chicago, Illinois Lines: 23 [] After taking Dan Pellegrino's advice, and thinking it about it, I think I tend to agree with Dan's idea about a group or subgroup for the religion/anti-religion debate. Actually the evolution/creation debate could also be moved to the same group, since it's really the same discussion at heart. I think we all could agree that there certainly is enough traffic on this topic for it to rate its own group, and it doesn't seem that the discussion is tapering off, or ever will. The only problem would be keeping the traffic in the group. I get the feeling that if the pro-religion side unsubscibed, the con side would gravitate back to net.religion, and if the pro-evolution side left, things would gravitate to net.physics. I think something like this may have been suggested some time before, but there is a LOT of traffic. (BTW, I'm pro on one issue, con on the other, and not sure if I would subscribe to the group.) ..we13!ll1!cej Chuck Jones AT&T Communications