Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!mhuxl!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj
From: jj@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Starvation and population (moved from net.religion)
Message-ID: <2450@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Jan-84 13:28:03 EST
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2450
Posted: Mon Jan 30 13:28:03 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 5-Feb-84 11:01:16 EST
References: <853@ut-sally.UUCP>, <657@dciem.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 25

>
>If having more food means population growing at a faster rate,
>how come the countries with the lowest population growth are
>those with the most food?
>-- 
>
>Martin Taylor
>{allegra,linus,ihnp4,uw-beaver,floyd,ubc-vision}!utzoo!dciem!mmt

Gee, Martin.  If you read any of the articles, you'd know the
answer.  Hate to tell you, but the countries with the most
food are DEVELOPED, and those without (with the possible exception
of the USSR) are UNDEVELOPED.  If you'd read the articles, you'd
see the correlation between LEVEL OF DEVELOPEMENT and POPULATION
GROWN discussed.

It must be nice to be able to flame away without reading the
articles you flame about, but I don't really have the gall to
do that.  
-- 
TEDDY BEARS ARE PEOPLE, TOO!

(allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj