Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sb1!sb6!bpa!burdvax!sjuvax!armstron From: armstron@sjuvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Re: Whats going on? Message-ID: <166@sjuvax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 16-Feb-84 11:48:03 EST Article-I.D.: sjuvax.166 Posted: Thu Feb 16 11:48:03 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Feb-84 03:11:27 EST References: <1692@rlgvax.UUCP>, <4848@rochester.UUCP> Organization: Saint Josephs Univ. Phila., Pa. Lines: 14 I agree with you on some points, but certainly not on RONIN. While Miller's (fantastic in my mind) art is "different", I would certainly not call it "scratchy". The connotation here is much too negative. I rather prefer to see Miller's art as innovative and stylish. It, unlike most comic art of today (not that I don't like comic art... I do !) challenges the reader to pick up the Miller's mental image of this futuristic land and the complex science it subscribes to; therefore, Miller's art is also complex... Oh well, it was a good thought anyway. Return of the Dragon, Len Armstrong St. Joseph's University.