Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cbosgd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!cbosgd!mark
From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.std,net.cog-eng
Subject: Re: DVORAK keyboard standards
Message-ID: <947@cbosgd.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Feb-84 20:02:26 EST
Article-I.D.: cbosgd.947
Posted: Thu Feb  9 20:02:26 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 10-Feb-84 09:03:32 EST
References: <835@ihuxm.UUCP> <986@proper.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus
Lines: 15

Did you know there is an ANSI standard keyboard layout for ASCII
terminals?  (I have the reference at work, it's called "for Office
Machine Keyboards" or some such thing, and is right behind X3.64
in our library's set of standards.)  Not only does it exist, but it's
got to be the most brain-damaged layout I've ever seen!  I've never
seen an implementation, and I can certainly understand why.

Among its other misfeatures, the keyboard has an extra key between Z
and the left hand shift key.  What, you say, did the IBM PC use that
bizarre layout because of the ANSI standard?  Well, not quite.  The
IBM PC has \ and | on that key.  The standard expects < and > to be
there.  It also has [ and ] on the same key, and { and } on the same
key, which might be reasonable, except that unshifted is ] and shifted
is [ (ditto for braces).  I'll try to remember to post the whole layout
tomorrow.