Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou2g.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!akgua!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!houxm!hou2g!yraurb From: yraurb@hou2g.UUCP (G.DECKER) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Bose and Linear Trackers Message-ID: <161@hou2g.UUCP> Date: Tue, 7-Feb-84 10:40:38 EST Article-I.D.: hou2g.161 Posted: Tue Feb 7 10:40:38 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 23:19:05 EST Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 15 In response to Mark Malleltt: I think that it was in the January Grammophone that I read an article written by a European officer of the AES who visited the Bose factory during a recent visit. He explained to Amar that he felt tht there was perhaps a difference between the Bose philosophy in playback and the typical European approach to miking /monitoring. In any case, the author said that Amar listened patiently and then offered some very convincing arguments (both scientific and demonstration wise) to support the Direct/Reflecting method. The author also stated that he frelt that the 9012's were capable of some very musical sounds. I think I remenmber reading about a Technics sld-3? in the new products section of Stereo Review of r High Fidelity a few months ago. A linear tracker with pitch control.