Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site aluxp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!aluxp!wrbull
From: wrbull@aluxp.UUCP (bullman)
Newsgroups: net.columbia
Subject: Re: Orbiting Debris Found
Message-ID: <1183@aluxp.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Feb-84 20:14:57 EST
Article-I.D.: aluxp.1183
Posted: Mon Feb  6 20:14:57 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 10:00:21 EST
References: <2573@alice.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Allentown, PA
Lines: 6

NASA reported that the second satellite also failed to achieve its 
intended orbit. One of the network news reported that the PAM was a 
solid booster, but I find that hard to believe since solids are not
solid booster, But thats hard to believe since solids are not really 
that "delicate" to put a payload in geosynch. Does anybody know what
propellant the PAM uses?