Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site drux3.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!drutx!drux3!trb From: trb@drux3.UUCP (Buckley) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Phil Karn and other CD nuts, please read! Message-ID: <1043@drux3.UUCP> Date: Fri, 3-Feb-84 14:14:55 EST Article-I.D.: drux3.1043 Posted: Fri Feb 3 14:14:55 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 8-Feb-84 04:27:36 EST Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 22 Phil Karn, Get off it! You obviously have never understood what Phil Rastocny is trying to say, and you obviously have some anti-analog bias that for some reason is clouding your judgement (not to mention your hearing). One wonders if you can really tell the difference in audio subtleties. A newcomer to wine-tasting would think two similar wines taste exactly the same. A newcomer to audio probably couldn't tell the difference between two similar high-quality systems. I think that describes you, Phil. The second-generation CDs are VERY good. Better than most analog systems. BUT, today's state-of-the-art analog is BETTER, and it makes for an enjoyable listening experience. Try it sometime. (And that goes for you, too, rabbit!jj). ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tom Buckley ...drux3!trb