Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bbncca.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!bbncca!keesan
From: keesan@bbncca.ARPA (Morris Keesan)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Precedence Question - (nf)
Message-ID: <573@bbncca.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 14-Feb-84 09:59:06 EST
Article-I.D.: bbncca.573
Posted: Tue Feb 14 09:59:06 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Feb-84 03:43:36 EST
References: <59@haddock.UUCP>
Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 24

-----------------------------   
A trivial quibble:

John Levine (ima!johnl) says

> In regard to this:
>
> 	  cat = foo ? fu = bar : mouse;

> Precedence has nothing to do with it.

and

> The only possible parse for the first expression is:
>
>	 cat = foo ? (fu = bar) : mouse;
----------------
    I agree that the question originally posed by smu!pedz has nothing to do
with precedence, but rather with order of evaluation.  However, precedence
does ordeN{
-- 
					Morris M. Keesan
					{decvax,linus,wjh12,ima}!bbncca!keesan
					keesan @ BBN-UNIX.ARPA