Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ccieng2.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccieng5!ccieng2!bwm From: bwm@ccieng2.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: LIBNETTERS READ Message-ID: <121@ccieng2.UUCP> Date: Wed, 15-Feb-84 12:15:26 EST Article-I.D.: ccieng2.121 Posted: Wed Feb 15 12:15:26 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 16-Feb-84 05:49:36 EST References: <567@pyuxa.UUCP> Organization: Computer Consoles Inc., Rochester, NY Lines: 16 You have all the insight of a baseball bat. Specifically: YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to tell me what I can and cannot do with my body. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to tell me what is and is not MORAL, because those are decisions I MUST make for myself. THIS DOES NOT IMPLY that I am not responsible for my actions. If I take PCP and put someone in a hospital, then I bloody well SHOULD be shot (preferably). There is a difference between what is unethical and what is illegal. I maintain that legality is nothing. If you catch me doing 60 in a 55mph zone, you have to PROVE I WAS ENDANGERING THE PUBLIC, not just quote a 55mph law. Etc. Nuff said. I think most other arguments from this point are obvious. A Libertarian -- ...[rlgvax, ritcv]!ccieng5!ccieng2!bwm