Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!mhuxl!mhuxm!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: laws against silliness Message-ID: <443@pyuxn.UUCP> Date: Mon, 6-Feb-84 12:14:41 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxn.443 Posted: Mon Feb 6 12:14:41 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 9-Feb-84 07:19:49 EST References: <5394@uiucdcs.UUCP> Organization: Central Services Org., Piscataway N.J. Lines: 19 Currently, there is a bill in Congress that would make silliness a crime. B.C.Mather Le Maitre uiucdcs!uicsl!mather But that would be a silly bill. Therefore if passed, it would be deemed illegal and revoked. But then it wouldn't be, meaning that it would be reinstated and ... (* SIGH *)! See you all in Tumbolia! Ken Kaufman ********************************* You are both forgetting that the Constitution clearly states (somewhere, just before the naughty bits) that Congress cannot pass a law that would cause it to abolish itself. -- Pardon me for breathing... Rich Rosen pyuxn!rlr